Hong Kong’s top court urges alternative legal framework for same-sex couples in landmark ruling

Published: 
Listen to this article
  • Ruling followed five-year legal battle by pro-democracy and LGBTQ rights activist Jimmy Sham
  • Judges did not allow for same sex marriage in the city, but gave government two years to ensure alternative legal rights for such couples
Reuters |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Hong Kong’s 7 most Instagrammable Christmas spots for your festive photo album

Hong Kong police investigate Han Academy over missing debenture refunds

SOTY 2023/24: Performing Artist second runner-up on her commitment to music

Afghan women devastated by new Taliban ban on medical training

Hong Kong authorities criticise exams for Primary One pupils in first semester

Hong Kong’s top court partially approved a landmark appeal for recognition of overseas same-sex marriages and called for new regulations for gay couples to cover their basic social needs. Photo: Shutterstock

Hong Kong’s top court partially approved on Tuesday a landmark appeal by an LGBTQ activist for recognition of overseas same-sex marriages, and called for new regulations for gay couples to cover their basic social needs.

The ruling by Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeal followed a five-year legal battle fought by jailed democracy and LGBTQ rights activist Jimmy Sham. It was the first time that the court directly addressed the issue of same-sex marriage in the Asian financial hub.

The judges did not allow for same sex marriage in Hong Kong but effectively gave the government two years to ensure rights, such as access to hospitals and inheritance, could be protected for same sex couples.

Hong Kong trans activist Henry Tse on how his journey inspired his fight for rights

Chief Justice Andrew Cheung, Permanent Judges Roberto Ribeiro, Joseph Fok, Johnson Lam, and Non-Permanent Judge Patrick Keane ruled that marriage freedoms outlined in Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, known as the Basic Law, were confined to opposite sex marriage.

But the judges acknowledged same sex couples’ need “for access to an alternative legal framework in order to meet basic social requirements.”

Same sex couples also needed to “have a sense of legitimacy which dispels any sense of them belonging to an inferior class of person whose committed and stable relationships are undeserving of recognition,” the judges wrote.

The Lady Justice statue outside the Court of Final Appeal. Photo: Reuters

The Hong Kong government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Lawyers and activists say the ruling could potentially force changes by the city’s government and institutions, and lead to the creation of a new legal regime to allow smoother inheritance and insurance options as well as tax allowances, among other rights.

The decision could also influence Asian financial hubs from Tokyo to Singapore to draft more inclusive laws as a drawcard for the diverse, global talent that multinational corporations from banks to technology giants are seeking to hire and retain.

Student-led ‘gender studies club’ gives teens in Hong Kong’s North district a safe space to discuss sex, LGBTQ issues

Mainland China decriminalised homosexuality in 1997, and in 2001, removed it from its list of mental illnesses, but same-sex marriage is not recognised and no official legal protections exist.

The judges suspended a declaration that the Hong Kong government’s lack of an alternative legal framework had violated Sham’s rights, giving the government two years to make further submissions.

In the ruling, judges Fok and Ribeiro noted “real difficulties in many situations” for some same sex couples, noting the need for them to participate fully in healthcare and hospitalisation decisions.

Detained activist Jimmy Sham leaves a prison van to enter the Court of Final Appeal on June 28, 2023. Sham partially won his final appeal on Tuesday, seeking recognition for same-sex marriages registered overseas. Photo: AP

“Problems like these have unsatisfactorily led to recurrent approaches to the courts asking them to deal with each controversy on a case-by-case basis,” they wrote.

“The absence of legal recognition has been seen to be essentially discriminatory and demeaning to same-sex couples.”

Sham, 36, married his partner in New York in 2013 and twice lost in lower courts after launching his bid for Hong Kong to recognise overseas same-sex marriages in 2018.

The history of LGBTQ Pride in the US and Hong Kong and how the fight for equality continues

Sham is one of the 47 democrats charged under the Beijing-imposed national security law over an unofficial primary election held in 2020 and has been detained since March 2021.

Esther Leung, campaign manager of the Hong Kong Marriage Equality group, said after the ruling that while the decision was a “major step forward, it falls short of what is really at stake in this case: full inclusion in marriage”.

“It is a significant victory which makes clear that Hong Kong law must afford due respect and protections to same-sex couples. This will help families while hurting no one,” Leung said. Hong Kong is due to host Asia’s first Gay Games in November – an event that could help boost Hong Kong’s lacklustre post-Covid economic recovery.

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment