bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Tribune News Service

The record of the year category for the 2025 Grammys is full of zesty pop hits from young female acts such as Chappell Roan, Charli XCX and Sabrina Carpenter.
There’s also Kendrick Lamar’s operatically vicious “Not Like Us” and some poignant, expansive work from Beyoncé (“Texas Hold ’Em”) and Billie Eilish (“Birds of a Feather”).
Then there’s the Beatles’ “Now and Then”. The quartet is back on the Grammy leaderboard a full six decades after winning their first statuette.
“Now and Then”, salvaged from a famously muddy demo from John Lennon, was made possible with the AI-driven, instrument-isolating mix technology first showcased in the documentary series The Beatles: Get Back.


Not even the deaths of Lennon and George Harrison could stand in the way of the most tantalising prospect in rock – a new and final Beatles single, featuring all four members together.
The Recording Academy lauded the single with record and rock performance nominations. The music industry saw the achievements of “Now and Then” as a major feat of production technology and songcraft.
But the academy has also set hard rules around where AI can aid in making music and where it is disqualifying.
“Now and Then” is perhaps the best-case scenario for AI’s place in music.
It’s a pearl of music history, made possible through subtle technology that illuminates, rather than generates. But will its Grammy success open the floodgates for more veteran artists to access and alter old recordings?


“I think AI is a bit like nuclear power. It can split the atom – is that a good idea? Yes if you’re creating energy, but no if it’s a bomb,” said Giles Martin, producer of “Now and Then” and son of long-time Beatles’ producer George Martin.
“For me, when I listen to John’s voice, without fabrication, I felt like I was with him. That’s almost the opposite of AI.”
In 2023, the Recording Academy laid ground rules for how music can incorporate artificial intelligence and still be eligible for awards. The rules say that “only human creators” can win Grammys, and that “the human authorship component of the work submitted must be meaningful”.
“A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any category,” the academy said.
“Now and Then”, released in November 2023, was never at risk there. The song, a home demo Lennon recorded in 1978, was well known to Beatles diehards. The surviving members even took a crack at properly recording and mixing it in 1995, to little avail.


For decades, the song was a holy grail for Fab Four devotees, the last song the whole band could conceivably all participate in.
It took the advanced vocal-isolation technology developed for Peter Jackson’s 2021 documentary The Beatles: Get Back, coupled with McCartney and Ringo Starr’s enthusiasm for the song and Martin’s deeply intimate mix work with a team of engineers, for the prize to come into reach.
“[Jackson] was able to extricate John’s voice from a ropy little bit of cassette,” McCartney told the BBC at the time. “We had John’s voice and a piano, and he could separate them with AI. They tell the machine, ‘That’s the voice. This is a guitar. Lose the guitar.’

“It’s kind of scary but exciting, because it’s the future,” he continued. “We’ll just have to see where that leads.”
But the premise of incorporating a controversial sphere of technology into a catalogue as globally cherished as the Beatles’ initially left some fans unnerved.
Martin and the musicians were quick to underline that the “AI” was more or less a superpowered version of common mixing tools, not the voice-emulating or song-generating software often associated with the worst of artificial intelligence in music.


“It’s a bit like Pompeii. Researchers found an amazing villa with a spa using new techniques to make an amazing discovery,” Martin said. “That’s the way I see what we’ve done. That building existed, so did John’s song. We used technology to clean it.”
The single – a beguilingly modest ballad with the band’s hallmark vocal harmonies and some wistful strings – put most fears to rest. It continued the Beatles’ lifelong interest in cutting-edge studio technology, from multitrack recording to tape-loop experiments.
“When Paul played it to me at Abbey Road, I thought ‘I’m a usurper here; my dad should be around’,” Martin said. “There’s an emotional responsibility to it all, so you just try to do the best you can.”

That investment from the surviving band members and their closest collaborators is a hallmark of ethical AI use, said Daniela Lieja Quintanar, the curator of All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace, a documentary about art and AI.
“When you have protocols and collaboration of the people who own the art or are caretakers of the art of others, the results are positive,” Quintanar said. “Artists and creatives should take agency over technology and hold those who developed it rapidly accountable.
“That is how many artist communities have been resisting the uses of machine learning by participating, researching, studying and writing rather than rejecting or fearing it.”
The premise of “Now and Then” worked beautifully, although Jackson’s music video for the single, featuring composite footage of all four members, was met with more mixed reviews. But it does raise new questions as corporate titans in media, tech and beyond push AI into everyday life and artmaking.


Will music begin to see more “lost” projects or canonical recordings revisited and altered, now up for new Grammy acclaim?
“I hope so. Imagine hearing James Brown’s Live at the Apollo; I’d love to experience that and hear it like I’m there,” Martin said.
“I don’t think there should be hard-and-fast rules. But I don’t want a future where you don’t even know who your favourite artist is, or you can have Bob Dylan singing ‘Happy Birthday’ to your kids. Anything generative should be disqualifying, full stop.”
Many Grammy voters were thrilled to have a new Beatles single in the world. Yet most academy members would probably not want classic rock perpetually refashioned with AI for an endless cycle of nostalgia.
Does the industry want [AI]? Some, for sure, but it’s coming either way. It’s going to eat huge chunks of work from people who make their living at music
Gregory Butler, composer, media and AI expert
In 2024, academy membership changes meant that two-thirds of the professionals who chose this year’s Grammy Award nominees were not members of the Recording Academy as recently as 2018.
For the working Grammy voters who may be feeling the cold breath of AI on their career prospects, the excitement around salvaged gems of music history could be tempered by looming threats of redundancy.
“I think the Beatles were an oddly safe choice for this push – they are the biggest band ever, but they can’t release new material,” said Gregory Butler, a media and AI technologist and a composer and producer on multiple Emmy- and Grammy- nominated projects.

“I think they split the difference – going big on saying it used AI, and then going small on the description of how it did. It sent a signal that ‘AI is your friend’ to artists and listeners.
“Does the industry want it? Some, for sure, but it’s coming either way. It’s going to eat huge chunks of work from people who make their living at music.”
If the Beatles were to triumph with record or rock performance wins, it would be a genuinely moving coda to the most acclaimed recording career in pop music.


“‘Now and Then’ as the last record, to me, is incredibly poignant, a song that John wrote to Paul,” Martin said. “Paul lost his best friend.
“Whatever differences they had, they lived an incredibly close life. I think Paul missed him, like he missed my dad. He missed him creatively, and he wanted to work with him again, to collaborate again. This technology was a pathway towards that.”
For now, that personal poignancy and cutting-edge tech can comfortably coexist at the Grammys, which will play a major role in setting guardrails for what writing, performing and recording music fundamentally means today.
These were questions the Beatles were asking 60 years ago and are again asking in 2025.
“My dad said the Beatles were very lucky. They tapped into every zeitgeist and had this natural ability to change with the seasons of the art they created,” Martin said. “If I talk to Paul, AI doesn’t worry him at all. Paul said ‘They’re never going to be me,’ and he’s right.
“It’s got executives worried, but at the end of the day, he can say, ‘I’m Paul McCartney’.”


Meet Kesha’s mum, songwriter Pebe Sebert: from crafting hits for Miley Cyrus and Miranda Cosgrove to backing her daughter’s legal battles with Dr Luke … but what was that Jeffrey Dahmer lyric about?

The Beatles may win a Grammy with the help of AI, but will others jump on the bandwagon?

Why is the Grammys’ best new artist award never really given to a new artist?

Who are the members of Il Divo? Simon Cowell founded the group in 2003 with David Miller, Sébastien Izambard, Urs Bühler and Carlos Marín, Steven LaBrie joining in 2023 after Marín’s death

Music

Paul McCartney (left) and John Lennon of the Beatles in 1964. A new record from the Beatles, produced with the help of AI, could win a Grammy this year. Photo: Getty Images

A pedestrian passes a mural depicting the Beatles members on the side of a building in Liverpool, the band’s home city in northwest England. Photo: AFP

Kendrick Lamar, who is up against The Beatles among other acts for the 2025 Grammy for best record. Photo: Getty Images

Beyoncé (right) performs at halftime during an NFL football game in Houston, Texas. She is among the artists vying with The Beatles for the record of the year Grammy. Photo: Getty Images

Franz Ferdinand pair on band’s new album, and how indie music has ‘never gone away’

Franz Ferdinand guitarist and singer Alex Kapranos performs in Edinburgh in 2014. Photo: AFP

Franz Ferdinand frontman Alex Kapranos and bassist Bob Hardy talk about writing a new album, and the band’s love for Chappell Roan and Charli XCX. Photo: AP

Franz Ferdinand in 2016. They formed in Glasgow in 2002.

British rock group Franz Ferdinand in Los Angeles in 2005. On January 10, they released The Human Fear. Photo: AFP

Kapranos onstage in Edinburgh in 2014. Photo: AFP

Franz Ferdinand in 2016. The band have never wavered in their dedication to 2000s indie ebullience.

When The Beatles came to Hong Kong in June 1964, and screaming teenagers welcomed the Fab Four at Kai Tak airport

Paul McCartney, George Harrison, John Lennon and Jimmie Nicol (standing in for an unwell Ringo Starr) wave to fans as they arrive at Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong on June, 8, 1964.

Black and white copy picture of South China Morning Post past issue of June 9, 1964, with front page story about Beatles.

***PLEASE CLEAR THE COPYRIGHTS BEFORE REUSE*** Female fans of the Beatles wave on the arrival of the band's members including Jimmie Nicol (drummer replacement for Ringo Starr) Paul McCartney, John Lennon and George Harrison at Kai Tak airport in Hong Kong on June, 8, 1964. 08JUN64 (SCMP REVIEW 28AUG13)

With solo album Her, K-pop star Minnie of (G)I-DLE explores different sides of herself

Minnie of K-pop group G-(I)DLE has released a solo album, Her. Photo: Instagram/min.nicha

A post from Minnie’s Instagram feed announcing the launch of her mini album Her. Photo: Instagram/min.nicha

1980s Hong Kong pop idol Danny Chan’s bittersweet success story: his talent, fame, the tabloid rumours, his retirement and early death

Singer Danny Chan Pak-keung puts one of his albums in a time capsule in 1991. Photo: SCMP

Danny Chan was one of Hong Hong’s “Three Kings and A Queen of Cantopop” in the 1980s, with fellow idols Leslie Cheung, Anita Mui and Alan Tam. Photo: SCMP

Yvonne Siu, project manager of TVB, presents a souvenir to Danny Chan in 1984. Photo: SCMP

Chan singing at his own birthday party in 1988. Photo: SCMP

Chan (left) and Jacky Cheung Hok-yau at the Top Ten Pop Stars Election in 1987. Photo: SCMP

There were numerous rumours about a relationship between Pansy Ho and Chan. Photo: Weibo

Chan performing at a concert to promote Aids awareness in 1990. Photo: SCMP

Chan was taken to Queen Mary Hospital after collapsing at home on May 19, 1992. Photo: SCMP

Flanked by singer Anita Mui Yim-fong and actor Chow Yun-fat, Danny Chan’s older brother Chan Pak-ling carries his younger brother’s picture at the singer’s funeral in 1993. Photo: SCMP

Lifestyle

Entertainment

Culture

AI was used to produce the new Beatles song Now and Then – although not as a creative tool, only to clean up the muddy original sound


AI was used to produce the new Beatles song Now and Then – although not as a creative tool, only to clean up the muddy original sound.


Artificial intelligence

Beyoncé

Billie Eilish