Opinion | Belt and Road Initiative 11 years on: are Southeast Asia-China economic ties still going strong?
- Economic engagement such as the Belt and Road Initiative has helped stabilise and strengthen China’s relationship with Southeast Asian countries
- Exploring common platforms to further Southeast Asia-China cooperation and region’s economic architecture is key as initiative heads into second decade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b39/40b39131a4adf08524203598685a6a911c67afd6" alt="The Jakarta-Bandung high-speed train named Whoosh is seen on a platform at the Tegalluar station in Bandung, West Java, on May 4. Photo: AFP"
Relations between great powers and their neighbouring regions are often fraught. The cases of the United States and Latin America, or the European Union and North Africa, come to mind.
For instance, tensions related to immigration from Latin America and North Africa, has led to the rise of right-wing populism in the US and Europe, respectively. This has fuelled the rise of populist politicians such as Donald Trump in the US and Marine Le Pen in France.
In China’s case, economic engagement has helped stabilise and strengthen its relationship with Southeast Asian countries, despite ongoing disputes in the South China Sea. One important facet of this engagement is the Belt and Road Initiative, which China launched 11 years ago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30c3f/30c3fc11b43b13c59bb815388b3cee2b969f2574" alt="Passengers in Laos wait to board the high-speed train at Vientiane station. Photo: SCMP Passengers in Laos wait to board the high-speed train at Vientiane station. Photo: SCMP"
Most of the Southeast Asian countries do not have the means to fund major infrastructure projects, resulting in an infrastructure deficit in the region. Chinese investments, including those of the Belt and Road Initiative, have thus become an important economic force in Southeast Asia. The reality is that very few economies have matched Chinese business groups’ appetite in pushing infrastructure projects, especially capital – and technology-intensive ones, which take a long time to produce returns. While other players have attempted to promote infrastructure building and other forms of cooperation in Southeast Asia, such as the EU’s Global Gateway, there is considerable room for improvement.
By contrast, Chinese firms have managed to deliver some of the most challenging projects in the region. Two recent examples come to mind: the Boten-Vientiane railway in Laos and the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway in Indonesia. The generally positive reception to these projects since their opening has likely increased the appeal of similar initiatives to the public.
Indonesia’s experience in opting for China (over Japan) for its landmark railway project is worth discussing. The Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway was one of the most heavily criticised Chinese projects before and during its construction. Despite some delays and dissenting voices along the way, the project began commercial operations in late 2023. Indonesian President Joko Widodo and Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs and Investment Luhut Pandjaitan are evidently satisfied enough with the project’s outcome to want to continue cooperating with the state-owned China Railway Group Limited to extend the railway service to Surabaya, Indonesia’s second-biggest city.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3ad2/e3ad2e76a409a9e719a40b7c2457b6cc5fc40d47" alt="loading"