Advertisement

China Briefing | Coronavirus: why Xi should do a Trump and hand out cash to cooped-up Chinese

  • Beijing appears to be relying on its usual method of boosting infrastructure to offset the economic gloom caused by the coronavirus
  • But it could boost both consumption and confidence – and help meet Xi’s poverty goals – by putting serious money in the hands of Chinese people

Reading Time:6 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Chinese President Xi Jinping visits people involved in front-line efforts to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus in Wuhan, Hubei province. Photo: Xinhua
Washington’s US$2 trillion stimulus bill to combat the slowdown caused by the coronavirus pandemic is truly impressive for both its scale and the speed with which it is coming into force.
Advertisement

Hailed as the biggest rescue package in US history, the bill – passed by the Senate last week and in the process of getting the nod from the House of Representatives – promises not only generous loans and grants to major industries and small businesses but also direct cash handouts to most adults who will receive US$1,200 per person and US$3,400 per family of four.

As a result, global stock markets rallied last week, with the Dow Jones index rebounding by 11 per cent on Tuesday, the biggest one-day percentage gain since 1933.

By contrast, China’s response to alleviating the devastating economic impact of the pandemic has been piecemeal and uninspiring. So far the central government in Beijing has resorted to the tried-and-tested approach of boosting infrastructure investment but is still dithering over how to boost consumer consumption.

An increasing number of cities, including Shenzhen, Nanjing and Ningbo, have decided to take matters into their own hands by announcing they will issue cash vouchers to encourage residents to dine out, watch movies, buy books and join local sightseeing tours.

But because of budget constraints, those cities’ voucher schemes are more like the gimmicks or marketing promotions of more normal times than genuine efforts to stimulate consumption in a time of crisis, when compared to their promises to spend hundreds of billions of yuan on infrastructure investments.

Advertisement