Australia’s 5G ban on China’s Huawei, ZTE: will others make same call?
Asian countries may be weighing the cost of abandoning cheaper Chinese tech – in terms of the higher outlay involved in rolling out the next generation of mobile wireless networks as well as the possible security implications
Citing national security concerns, Australia last month prohibited Huawei and ZTE from taking part in the development of the country’s fifth-generation mobile infrastructure, following the United States and Britain in deeming the two Chinese firms national security risks. The move made waves in the region; Japan is considering whether to beef up regulations to prevent espionage through foreign-made telecommunications gear, while India is said to be “cautious” over Huawei’s role in the country’s telecoms networks. Huawei and ZTE have repeatedly dismissed claims that they provided intelligence to Beijing.
“Huawei and ZTE, especially Huawei, are important stakeholders in terms of telecoms infrastructure. It is very difficult for any country – especially markets where there is cutthroat competition and operators are struggling on financials – to ignore them and go with tier-1 vendors like Nokia and Ericsson only,” says Faisal Kawoosa, founder and co-partner at New Delhi-based technology research and consulting firm techARC.
“Typically, operators in high-paying markets go with tier-1 vendors and in [low-paying] markets they go with the likes of Huawei and ZTE, which give them better [returns on investment], justifying the business case … the same will be the case with 5G.”