US and China must talk to manage dangers of AI contest in a nuclear age
The coexistence of the nuclear age with the AI age is a cocktail for unprecedented existential danger. Engagement, not decoupling, is needed

This is not just a technological contest. It is a contest between institutional systems. A quarter-century ago, during the debate over permanent normal trade relations with China, Washington confronted a familiar strategic question: engagement or confrontation.
One camp favoured sustained economic integration by supporting China’s admission into the World Trade Organization. The other sought to condition trade on human rights benchmarks. The underlying issue was whether economic engagement would moderate China’s behaviour or strengthen a strategic rival.
That framing is wrong. AI differs from earlier technologies in one critical respect. Its greatest impact comes not from isolated applications but integration. The most advanced systems are not stand-alone tools; they are enterprise-wide platforms that operate across functions – finance, logistics, manufacturing, intelligence and decision-making. Their value lies in how they connect systems and functions.
.jpeg?itok=pXZsS5XD&v=1779002345)