bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Agence France-Presse

Should Donald Trump be prosecuted for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 US election?
The question, laden with consequences, hangs over Washington following the conclusion of a series of hearings by the House panel probing the attack on the US Capitol.
And with the 76-year-old Trump hinting at a new White House run in 2024, it has taken on added urgency.
The weighty decision to potentially bring charges against the former president rests essentially with one man: Attorney general Merrick Garland.
‘187 minutes of inaction’: Trump watched TV as mob attacked Capitol
Here is a look at some of the possible charges – and political fallout – should the 69-year-old Garland pursue an indictment of Trump:
During eight televised public hearings, the House committee presented a road map for the head of the Justice Department to potentially follow.
Trump knew he lost the election – his advisers told him so and his legal challenges went nowhere – but he continued to insist it was “stolen” by Democrat Joe Biden.
Trump pressured election officials in Georgia to “find” the votes he needed to win and tried to strong-arm then vice-president Mike Pence into not certifying the election results at the January 6 meeting of Congress.
Trump summoned his supporters to Washington, telling them in a fiery speech near the White House to “fight like hell.”
He then sat back for three hours and watched on TV as his loyal backers violently attacked the Capitol in a bid to block congressional certification of Biden’s victory.


As for specific crimes, legal analysts said that Trump could face at least two charges: “conspiracy to defraud the United States” for seeking to overturn the election results and “obstruction of an official proceeding” for the Capitol attack.
Obstruction of an official proceeding has been the charge most often used against the hundreds of Trump supporters arrested for breaching the Capitol.
Besides the legal ramifications, an unprecedented prosecution of a former chief executive would likely cause a political earthquake in a volatile country already starkly divided along partisan Democratic and Republican lines.
“Indicting a past and possible future political adversary of the current president would be a cataclysmic event from which the nation would not soon recover,” said Jack Goldsmith, who served as an assistant attorney general in the George W. Bush administration.
“It would be seen by many as politicised retribution,” Goldsmith said in a New York Times op-ed, threatening to “further inflame our already blazing partisan acrimony.”
I certainly recognise that indicting a former president would generate lots of social heat, perhaps violence
Laurence Tribe, law professor
Rich Lowry, editor of the conservative National Review, said prosecuting the former president would be a “catastrophic misstep by Trump’s enemies” that could even wind up giving him a boost politically.
“Our institutions aren’t in robust health and are ill-equipped to withstand the intense turbulence that would result from prosecuting the political champion of millions of people,” Lowry wrote in Politico. “The case would presumably drag on for years.”
Laurence Tribe, a Harvard law professor, argued that not holding Trump accountable would be equally harmful.
“I certainly recognise that indicting a former president would generate lots of social heat, perhaps violence,” Tribe said. “But not indicting him would invite another violent insurrection.”
Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon convicted of contempt of US Congress
Garland, the attorney general, has been asked frequently about his intentions but has been careful not to tip his hand.
He said recently the January 6 probe is the “most important” Justice Department investigation ever and it has to “get this right.”
“We have to hold accountable every person who is criminally responsible for trying to overturn a legitimate election,” Garland said, emphasising that “no person is above the law.”
A former prosecutor and judge, Garland was appointed attorney general by Biden after being famously deprived of a seat on the Supreme Court by the Republican-controlled Senate in 2016.
Garland has a reputation for being cautious and scrupulously fair, leading to speculation he may appoint a special prosecutor to handle Trump’s legal case to avoid any perception of conflict of interest.

Tribe, Garland’s former professor at Harvard, said he believes the attorney general will ultimately indict Trump.
“He said he’d go to the top if that’s where the evidence points and that’s certainly where it’s pointing now,” Tribe told CNN. “I do think the odds are he will be indicted.”
Trump, who was impeached by the House for the January 6 insurrection but acquitted by the Senate, has spent weeks railing against what he calls a partisan “kangaroo court.”
In a 12-page statement released in mid-June, Trump said the House committee was “making a mockery of justice.”
“They have refused to allow their political opponents to participate in this process, and have excluded all exculpatory witnesses, and anyone who so easily points out the flaws in their story,” he said.
“Democrats created the narrative of January 6th to detract from the much larger and more important truth that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen,” he said.
Trump eyes early launch to 2024 White House run
William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, said prosecutors would be required to prove not only that Trump was “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but that he had an intention to violate the law.
“Not just that he obstructed the congressional proceeding by making it virtually impossible to count the votes and certify the election, but that’s what he intended to do,” Banks said.
Trump’s lawyers, he said, could counter that narrative by casting him as a “patriot who truly believed that the election had been stolen from him and he was trying to save the country.”


As China’s vertical-drama frenzy spreads to US, soft-influence exports bring risk, rewards

Homebuyers snap up flats at Wang On’s 101 King’s Road project amid market revival

Where are the nurses? Will higher pay lure non-locals to Hong Kong?

US senator says Trump would laugh at Canada’s military spending, tells Trudeau to do more

United States

Will Donald Trump be prosecuted over US Capitol attack?

Former US president Donald Trump. Photo: Getty Images/TNS

US attorney general Merrick Garland. Photo: EPA-EFE

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon convicted of contempt of US Congress

Former White House senior strategist Steve Bannon arrives at the Federal District Court House in Washington on Friday. Photo: Getty Images / TNS

Steve Bannon outside the US District Court in Washington on Thursday. Photo: Reuters 

Former US President Donald Trump, left, and Steve Bannon in 2017. Photo: AFP

January 6 panel lays out Donald Trump’s ‘187 minutes of inaction’ when he watched TV in dining room

This exhibit from video released by the House Select Committee, shows President Donald Trump recording a video statement at the White House on January 7, 2021. Photo: AP

A photo of Donald Trump, which was taken as he entered the Oval Office after speaking at the rally on the Ellipse on January 6. Photo: AP

Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley said he was surprised Donald Trump didn’t call the military during the Capitol attack. Photo: AFP

Rioters outside the US Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2021. File photo: AP

News

World

United States & Canada


Experts warn the country faces legal and political consequences if attorney general Merrick Garland pursues an unprecedented indictment of the former president
However, a law professor argued that ‘not prosecuting him would invite another violent insurrection’



Experts warn the country faces legal and political consequences if attorney general Merrick Garland pursues an unprecedented indictment of the former president.


Donald Trump

Joe Biden

US presidential election 2020

US Politics

Will Donald Trump be prosecuted over US Capitol attack?

Experts warn the country faces legal and political consequences if attorney general Merrick Garland pursues an unprecedented indictment of the former president However, a law professor argued that ‘not prosecuting him would invite another violent insurrection’

Experts warn the country faces legal and political consequences if attorney general Merrick Garland pursues an unprecedented indictment of the former president

However, a law professor argued that ‘not prosecuting him would invite another violent insurrection’