Advertisement

Infecting volunteers with Covid-19 may speed up coronavirus vaccine studies, WHO says

  • A challenge study, where treatments are tested directly against the infection in informed volunteers, might speed the path of vaccines to the public
  • But officials at Moderna, where the lead vaccine for Covid-19 is in development, aren’t enthusiastic about the idea

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
A researcher works on a potential vaccine for the coronavirus at Pfizer’s laboratory in Pearl River, New York. Photo: Reuters
Deliberately infecting healthy volunteers with the virus that causes Covid-19 may speed studies of vaccines against the deadly pathogen, the World Health Organisation (WHO) said.
Advertisement

Such studies, which pose significant potential dangers to subjects, may be considered in dire situations and with certain disclosures and protections, a working group of the United Nations health agency said in a report posted on Wednesday on its website.

Researchers around the world are racing to develop vaccines to protect against the deadly coronavirus and allow countries to rebuild teetering economies.
So-called challenge studies, where treatments or preventatives are tested directly against the infection in informed volunteers, might speed the path of vaccines to the public.

Challenge studies “can be substantially faster to conduct than vaccine field trials,” according to the working group paper, “in part because far fewer participants need to be exposed to experimental vaccines to provide (preliminary) estimates of efficacy and safety.”

Advertisement

The report laid out eight conditions that would need to be fulfilled for challenge studies to be considered, including scientific justification, an assessment of potential benefits and the fully informed consent of subjects.

Challenge studies hold the potential to reduce coronavirus mortality around the world but pose significant potential dangers for volunteers, scientists led by Marc Lipsitch, a Harvard School of Public Health epidemiologist, suggested in a recent paper.

Advertisement