bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Agence France-Presse

Are eight billion humans too many for planet Earth? As we reach this milestone on November 15, most experts say the bigger problem is the overconsumption of resources by the wealthiest residents.
“Eight billion people, it is a momentous milestone for humanity,” said United Nations Population Fund chief Natalia Kanem, hailing an increase in life expectancy and fewer maternal and child deaths.
“Yet, I realise this moment might not be celebrated by all. Some express concerns that our world is overpopulated. I am here to say clearly that the sheer number of human lives is not a cause for fear.”
So, are there too many of us for Earth to sustain?
Many experts say that this is the wrong question. Instead of the fear of overpopulation, we should focus on the overconsumption of the planet’s resources by the wealthiest among us.
“Too many for whom, too many for what? If you ask me, am I too many? I don’t think so,” Joel Cohen of Rockefeller University’s Laboratory of Populations said.
Possible human extinction a ‘dangerously underexplored topic’
He said the question of how many people Earth can support has two sides: natural limits and human choices.
Our choices result in humans consuming far more biological resources, such as forests and land, than the planet can regenerate each year.
The overconsumption of fossil fuels, for example, leads to more carbon dioxide emissions, responsible for global warming.
We would need the biocapacity of 1.75 Earths to sustainably meet the needs of the current population, according to the Global Footprint Network and WWF NGOs.
The most recent UN climate report mentions population growth as one of the main drivers of an increase in greenhouse gases. However, it plays a smaller role than economic growth.
“We are stupid. We lacked foresight. We are greedy. We don’t use the information we have. That’s where the choices and the problems lie,” said Cohen.


However, he rejects the idea that humans are a curse on the planet, saying people should be given better choices.
“Our impact on the planet is driven far more by our behaviour than by our numbers,” said Jennifer Sciubba, a researcher at the Wilson Centre, a think tank.
“It’s lazy and damaging to keep going back to overpopulation,” she added, as this allows people in wealthy nations, who consume the most, to cast the blame for the planet’s woes onto developing countries where population growth is highest.
Why China faces a long struggle to arrest its population decline
“Really, it’s us. It’s me and you, the air conditioning I enjoy, the pool I have outside, and the meat I eat at night that causes so much more damage.”
If everyone on the planet lived like a citizen of India, we would only need the capacity of 0.8 Earths a year, according to the Global Footprint Network and WWF. If we all consumed like a resident of the United States, we would need five Earths a year.
The United Nations estimates that our planet will be home to 9.7 billion people by 2050.

One of the trickiest questions that arise when discussing population is that of controlling fertility. Even those who believe we need to lower the Earth’s population are adamant about protecting women’s rights.
Robin Maynard, the executive director of the NGO Population Matters, says there needs to be a decrease in the population, but “only through positive, voluntary, rights-respecting means” and not “deplorable examples” of population control.
The NGO Project Drawdown lists education and family planning among the top 100 solutions to halt global warming.
Drop in newborn screening underscores China’s birth crisis
“A smaller population with sustainable levels of consumption would reduce demands on energy, transportation, materials, food, and natural systems.”
Vanessa Perez of the World Resources Institute agrees that “every person that is born on the planet puts additional stress on the planet”.
“It is a very thorny issue,” she said, adding that we should reject “this idea that the elite capture this narrative and say we need to cap population growth in the South.”
She believes the most interesting debate is not about the number of people but “distribution and equity.”
Cohen points out that even if we currently produce enough food for 8 billion people, there are still 800 million people who are “chronically undernourished.”
“The concept of ‘too many’ avoids the much more difficult problem, which is: are we using what we know to make the human beings we have as healthy, productive, happy, peaceful, and prosperous as we could?”


Hong Kong’s surprising history of recycling

Cruise companies aim to be ‘net zero’ by 2050. Can they do it?

China amps up nuclear ambitions with 10 new reactor approvals for fourth straight year

Philippines’ Bulusan Volcano erupts, spewing ash 4.5km high

Environment

Planet Earth: 8 billion people and dwindling resources

The United Nations estimates that our planet will be home to 9.7 billion people by 2050. File photo: Nasa

Commuters walking through a subway station in Seoul. The global population will breach the symbolic level of 8 billion on November 15, according to the UN. Photo: AFP

China population: urbanisation offers ‘huge’ source of untapped labour and consumption

People older than 60 account for more than 20 per cent of residents in 13 of China’s 31 provincial-level jurisdictions. Photo: Getty Images

Chinese mothers gave birth to 10.62 million babies in 2021, an 11.5 per cent fall from 2020. Photo: AFP

Japan’s population drops most in 9 years, number of over-65s hits record high

Elderly women walk through a traditional alley in Kyoto. Photo: LightRocket via Getty Images

Elderly women walk through a traditional alley in Kyoto. People aged 65 or older now account for a record 29 per cent of the entire Japanese population. Photo: LightRocket via Getty Images

Quarter of world’s population at risk from once-in-a-century floods

Large parts of southern China, including Guangxi region, are currently under water. Photo: AFP

Residents navigate a flooded area after heavy rains in Yingde, Guangdong province. Photo: AFP

China’s falling birth rate prompts Elon Musk to warn of looming ‘population collapse’

Elon Musk, whose Tesla firm has a major factory in Shanhai, tweeted: “At current birth rates, China will lose ~40 per cent of people every generation!” Photo: Getty Images for The Met Museum

News

World


The UN estimates that the global human population will reach 8 billion by mid-November
Experts say overconsumption of the planet’s resources is a bigger problem than overpopulation



Are eight billion humans too many for planet Earth? As we reach this milestone on November 15, most experts say the bigger problem is the overconsumption of resources by the wealthiest residents


Climate change

Energy

United Nations

Conservation

Planet Earth: 8 billion people and dwindling resources

The UN estimates that the global human population will reach 8 billion by mid-November Experts say overconsumption of the planet’s resources is a bigger problem than overpopulation

The UN estimates that the global human population will reach 8 billion by mid-November

Experts say overconsumption of the planet’s resources is a bigger problem than overpopulation