Advertisement
US-Venezuela conflict
WorldAmericas

Venezuela’s Maduro and wife back in US court, as judge sets trial date

The ousted president’s lawyer argues that as a head of state, he should be immune from prosecution in the drug-trafficking case

3-MIN READ3-MIN
Listen
Captured Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro is seen at Downtown Manhattan Heliport, New York, on January 5 after his capture in Caracas. Photo: Reuters
Reuters

A judge on Wednesday set a June 1, 2027, trial date for ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores on US drug-trafficking charges, while a defence lawyer vowed to seek dismissal of the case on the grounds that Maduro is immune from prosecution as the head of a sovereign state.

Maduro and his wife, wearing beige prison garb, appeared during a hearing lasting about ‌20 minutes in Manhattan federal court before District Judge Alvin Hellerstein in one of the most consequential criminal cases in recent US history.

US commandos captured Maduro, 63, and Flores, 69, at their heavily guarded home in Caracas during a January 3 nighttime military raid ordered by President Donald Trump.

They were brought to New York, where they had previously been indicted on charges of using their leadership positions in the oil-rich South American country to facilitate cocaine shipments. They have pleaded not guilty.

In addition to scheduling the date for the trial to begin, Hellerstein set a September 2 deadline for Maduro’s first round of legal motions seeking to have the case dismissed, as well as a ⁠November 17 hearing for arguments over those motions.

A motorcade believed to be transporting former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, arrives at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in New York on Wednesday. Photo: AP
A motorcade believed to be transporting former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, arrives at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in New York on Wednesday. Photo: AP

Defence lawyer Barry Pollack told the judge he would seek to dismiss the case on immunity grounds.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x