Advertisement

Hong Kong antitrust watchdog, police raid dozen funeral service companies and trade association over anti-competition allegations

  • Competition Commission searches 13 premises including funeral parlour cluster in Hung Hom
  • Investigation is follow-up operation from last August, when commission conducted surprise inspection of funeral service practitioners at forensic centre

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Funeral service staff carry a coffin in Hung Hom. Hong Kong’s antitrust watchdog raided several businesses in the area on Wednesday. Photo: Yik Yeung-man

Hong Kong’s antitrust watchdog and police have raided a dozen funeral service companies as well as a trade association alleged to have taken part in price-fixing and other anti-competition practices.

Advertisement
The Competition Commission said it searched 13 premises early on Wednesday, including several businesses in Hung Hom – an area known for its cluster of funeral parlours – as well as others in Tuen Mun and Yuen Long.

The investigation was a follow-up operation by the watchdog from last August, when it conducted a surprise visit to the New Territories (Shatin) Forensic Medicine Centre, formerly Fu Shan Public Mortuary.

Competition Commission officers conduct a search at a funeral service business. Photo: Handout
Competition Commission officers conduct a search at a funeral service business. Photo: Handout
Hong Kong authorities acted on intelligence alleging funeral service practitioners had engaged in market sharing through coordination of their customer solicitation at the centre.

The watchdog said market sharing referred to when competitors agreed to divide or allocate customers, suppliers or geographic areas.

Authorities also said that a trade association and some funeral service companies as well as practitioners were “suspected of having engaged in anticompetitive conduct, including price-fixing”, based on information obtained from the August case.

Advertisement

“The commission therefore initiated another case to pursue the matter further and was satisfied that there is ‘reasonable cause to suspect’ a contravention of a competition rule,” its statement said in its explanation to escalate the case to the investigation phase.

Advertisement