Advertisement

National security law: protest slogan ‘Liberate Hong Kong’ can have multiple meanings, but is it ultimately a call for secession?

  • Defence lawyers argue slogan ‘Liberate Hong Kong; revolution of our times’ can be ambiguous, while prosecutors insist there is only one literal meaning
  • Judges say it is sufficient for the prosecution to prove that inciting others to take separatist action is a possible effect

Reading Time:7 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
61
The ‘Liberate Hong Kong’ slogan was a popular rallying cry for protesters during the 2019 social unrest. Photo: Sam Tsang
Hong Kong’s first trial under its one-year-old national security law had sparked what appeared to be a semantic dispute but one with potentially far-reaching consequences.
Advertisement

On Tuesday, restaurant worker Leon Tong Ying-kit, 24, was found guilty of inciting others to commit secession and engaging in a terrorist act after crashing his motorcycle into three police officers while carrying a black flag at a July 1 protest in Wan Chai last year.

The black flag had white Chinese characters that together read: “Liberate Hong Kong; revolution of our times”. A signature slogan widely used in chants and banners at the height of the 2019 anti-government protests, it became one of the focal points of the three-week trial.

The court’s judgment turned on the slogan, its meaning and usage, with seven days of the proceedings examining these.

At the heart of the issue for both sides was this: was there only one interpretation to the rallying call being one that promoted secessionist activities, or could it have an alternative meaning?

Advertisement

Prosecutors had insisted the answer to the question was a simple “no”, citing a historian’s opinion and police reports on the demonstrations. They had argued the catchphrase could only carry a literal meaning: to recover or free Hong Kong from the control of the “enemy” and cause a change in the “times” by overthrowing the government.

Advertisement