Advertisement

US-China TV debate’s lack of flash panned on Chinese social media

  • Online reaction finds Fox’s Trish Regan and CGTN’s Liu Xin clash too mild, too short, and too rude

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Text of the debate between Trish Regan of Fox Business and Liu Xin from CGTN, on the Chinese broadcaster’s live mobile feed. Photo: Simon Song
Kinling Loin Beijing

Disappointed commenters flooded China’s social media on Thursday with complaints that the on-air debate between an American and a Chinese news anchor on the trade war was too “mild” and too “short” – and that the “rude” Fox Business host Trish Regan kept interrupting CGTN’s Liu Xin.

Advertisement

The debate between the anchors – both TV personalities in their home countries – was broadcast live on the American channel Fox Business on Wednesday night US time after a week of sparring between the duo on air and on Twitter.

Both were keen to defend their own administration’s stance, with China and the US locked in an escalating trade war – official talks stalled after a deal fell through unexpectedly earlier this month.

While details of the official discussions have been largely kept from the Chinese public, the live exchange was hotly anticipated in China, where it is rare to see local journalists taking part in foreign media programmes because of the country’s strict censorship and media controls.

Fox Business anchor Trish Regan (left) and Liu Xin from Chinese broadcaster CGTN go head to head on US television in a discussion that drew a disappointed reaction on China’s social media. Photo: Twitter
Fox Business anchor Trish Regan (left) and Liu Xin from Chinese broadcaster CGTN go head to head on US television in a discussion that drew a disappointed reaction on China’s social media. Photo: Twitter
Advertisement

Liu, one of the highest profile anchors at English language state broadcaster China Global Television Network (CGTN), was therefore expected to give a rare glimpse into the latest view from Beijing on its stance in the ongoing trade conflict.

Advertisement