Advertisement

US beats China in soft power and popularity in Southeast Asia, giving it regional edge: analysis

  • Majority of citizens in 10 countries examined trusted Washington over Beijing, especially in Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam
  • China widely seen as major economic power, while the US perceived as providing significant traditional development aid

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
99+
Concerns about China’s behaviour and intentions in Southeast Asia create diplomatic and economic openings for the US, according to the report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Photo: Shutterstock
Mark Magnierin New York

The United States enjoys greater soft power and popularity in Southeast Asia than China, presenting Washington a distinct advantage as the two giants face off in the strategically vital region, a comprehensive polling analysis released on Tuesday found.

Advertisement
A majority of citizens, particularly in the region’s most populous nations – Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam – trusted US policies and intentions more than China’s, according to the white paper by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank. This gave the US the upper hand in cementing alliances on a range of issues or at least keeping regional states from aligning with Beijing to Washington’s detriment.

“Washington needs to be more attuned to how individual countries perceive their relations with the United States and China and shape its levers of engagement accordingly,” the 24-page report said.

Growing concerns about Beijing’s behaviour and intentions create diplomatic and economic openings across the region, it added. “And Washington should advance a positive political, security, and economic agenda to meet the moment.”

But the report, titled “Assessing US and Chinese Influence in Southeast Asia”, also noted that soft power was not the only factor at play. It argued that hard power and the ability to deliver concrete benefits also matter, though it did not weigh in on their relative effectiveness.

Advertisement
Advertisement