Olympic committee accused of ‘gross hypocrisy’ over Xinjiang silence after taking action on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
- The discrepancy affirms what critics of the International Olympic Committee believe to be a long pattern of deference to Chinese leaders
- ‘The IOC is a morally bankrupt organisation and inconsistent in its actions,’ says a member of the US Congress

As International Olympic Committee officials were attacked in recent years over their refusal to weigh in on alleged rights abuses in China, they stuck rigidly to one retort: the IOC is an impartial body and sport must be insulated from politics.
“The position of the IOC must be, given [our] political neutrality, that we are not commenting on political issues,” IOC President Thomas Bach said on the eve of the Beijing Winter Games last month.
The contrasting responses have left human rights advocates, Olympic observers and lawmakers questioning the IOC’s justification for not criticising Beijing, compounding long-standing criticism that it has turned a blind eye to China’s crackdown on ethnic minority groups, its tightening grip on Hong Kong and stifling of dissent.
“While the IOC’s swift banning of Russia is the right step to take, it reveals a gross hypocrisy that in the face of genocide they refused to disqualify the Chinese Communist Party from hosting the Olympics,” said US Representative Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican.