customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

knowledgeQuestion

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Reuters

Samsung, Xiaomi, and other smartphone companies colluded with Amazon and Walmart’s Flipkart to exclusively launch products on the e-commerce firms’ Indian websites in breach of antitrust laws, according to regulatory reports seen by Reuters.
Antitrust investigations conducted by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) have found that Amazon and Flipkart violated local competition laws by giving preference to select sellers, prioritising certain listings, and steeply discounting products, hurting other companies.
The CCI’s 1,027-page report on Amazon also said the Indian units of five companies – Samsung, Xiaomi, Motorola, Realme and OnePlus – were “involved in the practice of exclusive” phone launches in “collusion” with Amazon and its affiliates, breaking competition law.
In Flipkart’s case, a 1,696-page CCI report said the Indian units of Samsung, Xiaomi, Motorola, Vivo, Lenovo and Realme conducted similar practices.
The inclusion of smartphone makers like Samsung and Xiaomi in the case could increase their legal and compliance headaches.
“Exclusivity in business is anathema. Not only is it against free and fair competition but also against the interest of consumers,” CCI’s additional director general G.V. Siva Prasad wrote in the Amazon and Flipkart reports, in identical findings.
The smartphone companies have been accused of anticompetitive behaviour in the CCI’s reports which are dated Auguse 9 and are not public.

Xiaomi declined to comment, while the other smartphone makers did not respond to requests for comment.
Amazon, Flipkart, and the CCI did not respond, and have not so far commented on the reports’ findings.
Both the CCI reports said that during investigations Amazon and Flipkart “deliberately downplayed” allegations of exclusive launches, but officials found the practice was “rampant”.
Counterpoint Research data shows that South Korea’s Samsung and China’s Xiaomi are two of India’s biggest smartphone players, together holding an almost 36 per cent market share, with China’s Vivo on 19 per cent.
India’s e-retail market is set to exceed US$160 billion by 2028, up from US$57-60 billion in 2023, consultancy firm Bain estimates.
The investigation findings are a major setback for Amazon and Flipkart in a key growth market where they have faced the ire of small retailers for years for hurting their offline businesses.
The CCI has also said both companies used their foreign investments to provide subsidised rates for services like warehousing and marketing to a select number of sellers.
Online sales boom
Some of the smartphone companies – Xiaomi, Samsung, OnePlus, Realme and Motorola – have been ordered to submit their financial statements for three financial years to 2024, certified by their auditor, to the CCI, according to an internal CCI document dated August 28.

The investigation into Amazon, Flipkart, and their sellers was triggered in 2020 by a complaint from an affiliate of the country’s biggest retailer association, the Confederation of All India Traders, which has 80 million members.
The CCI will in coming weeks review any objections to its findings from Amazon, Flipkart, the retailer association, and the smartphone companies, and could potentially impose fines along with mandating companies to change their business practices, people familiar with the matter said.
Indian retailers have repeatedly accused Amazon and Flipkart, and smartphone companies, of exclusive phone launches online, saying shopkeepers suffered as they did not get the latest models and customers looked for them on the shopping websites.
“Exclusive launches had not only severely affected the ordinary sellers on the platform but also the brick-and-mortar retailers who were provided mobile phones at a much later date,” both CCI reports said, citing analyses of data from smartphone companies.
Indian research firm Datum Intelligence estimates that 50 per cent of phone sales were online last year, up from 14.5 per cent in 2013. Flipkart had a 55 per cent share in online phone sales in 2023, and Amazon 35 per cent.


Quad plans joint patrols in Indo-Pacific to counter illegal fishing where China’s influence growing

‘They’re criminals’: why cow vigilante violence in India has surged under Modi 3.0

India’s middle class reshaping Asia tourism as sector pivots to next big market: analysts

India accuses Samsung, Xiaomi of colluding with Amazon, Flipkart

India

Smartphone with Amazon logo is seen in front of displayed Flipkart logo and Indian flag in this illustration. Photo: Reuters

Workers stage a protest to demand higher wages and recognition of their union, at Samsung India’s plant in Sriperumbudur, near Chennai, on September 11, 2024. Samsung Electronics workers in southern India went on strike from September 9 to demand better pay and working hours, with the consumer tech giant promising the industrial action would not impact consumers. Photo: AFP

Workers move products for sale at the Flipkart Malur Warehouse in Karnataka on the outskirts of Bengaluru, India, 10 September 2024. The Walmart-owned Indian e-commerce company Flipkart is accused by India’s competition commission of colluding with smartphone companies Samsung, Xiaomi, Motorola, Vivo, Lenovo and Realme to violate antitrust laws. EPA/EFE

South Korea’s China-linked US$4 billion tech theft triggers outcry for tougher penalties

Observers are increasingly concerned about the outflow of critical technology from South Korea, particularly to China. Photo: Shutterstock

Samsung Electronics microchips are seen displayed at one of the company’s store in Seoul. Photo: AP

The logo of Samsung Electronics is seen at its office building in Seoul. Photo: Reuters

Officials inspect a semiconductor production line during a visit to a SK Hynix plant in Incheon in January. Photo: South Korean Industry Ministry/Handout via EPA-EFE

Apple starts iPhone 16 production in India, diversifying supply chain away from China

Apple’s decision to manufacture its iPhone 16 series in India marks a significant shift in its strategy, diversifying its supply chain away from China amid geopolitical tensions. Photo: Shutterstock

Apple’s shift to manufacturing the iPhone 16 in India marks a strategic move to diversify its supply chain. Photo: Bloomberg

Job aspirants talk to a hiring agent outside the Foxconn factory, where workers assemble iPhones for Apple, in Sriperumbudur, near Chennai, India. Photo: Reuters

Lazada’s youngest executive sees AI, logistics as biggest strengths against rivals like Temu

Lazada Thailand CEO Varitha Kiatpinyochai (right) discusses e-commerce trends in Southeast Asia with South China Morning Post technology production editor Matt Haldane at the Hong Kong-Asean Summit 2024 on September 13. Photo: Eugene Lee

Lazada staff members working in Bangkok, Thailand, on October 21, 2019. Photo: Xinhua

Netflix series on Indian plane hijack sparks controversy about streaming content

Rajiv Thakur as “Burger,” the chief hijacker. 
“IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack” is a 2024 Indian Hindi-language crime thriller drama television mini series about the hijacking of Indian Airlines Flight 814 in 1999. Photo: Handout

A Netflix series about the 1999 Indian Airlines hijacking has sparked controversy in India. Photo: Handout

Netflix’s “IC-814: The Kandahar Hijack” faces backlash in India for using Hindu names for Islamic militants, sparking debates on cultural sensitivity. Photo: Handout

Armed Taliban fighters next to the hijacked Indian Airline jet at the Kandahar Airport on December 27, 1999. File photo: Handout

Samsung said to slash 8% of sales team in mainland China amid weak performance

Shoppers at a Samsung Electronics store, next to other smartphone retailers,  inside the Xidan Joy City Shopping Centre in Beijing. Photo: Shutterstock

Exterior view of Samsung Tower, the headquarters of Samsung Electronics’ mainland China unit, in Beijing. Photo: Shutterstock

Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy Z Fold5 and Z Flip5 3D foldable smartphone displays are seen at the company’s flagship store in Shanghai last October. Photo: Shutterstock

News

Asia

South Asia

Smartphone companies violated competition laws by giving preference to select sellers, prioritising listings, and offering steep discounts


Smartphone companies violated competition laws by giving preference to select sellers, prioritising listings, and offering steep discounts.


Samsung Electronics

Amazon