Then & Now | When Hong Kong changed hands from Britain to China, so too did the patriotism of its citizens evolve
- Previously loyal subjects of the colony suddenly rediscovered how ‘Chinese’ they were as the handover loomed
- During the Sino-British negotiations, ‘instant noodle’ patriotism became a sarcastic local label
Patriotism among Hong Kong Chinese has always been a fluid, and periodically vexed, emotional concept. Whether sentiment is outwardly directed towards Britain, China – or countries such as Canada, New Zealand or Australia, where the individual holds citizenship (while conveniently not revoking their Chinese nationality) – or Hong Kong as a vague “city state”, locating just where ultimate loyalty lies has been complex.
In British times, exclusion of Chinese from senior participatory bodies, until the late colonial period, largely hinged on questions of ultimate loyalty – not race, as is usually believed. If push came to shove, would individual Hong Kong Chinese remain loyal to Britain, or at least to the British colony of Hong Kong, as their real and only home? Or would the gravitational pull of a shared common language, culture and racial ancestry, combined with personal, political or economic pressures exerted from China, tip the scales?
Owing to these conflicting “patriotic” demands, many Hong Kong Chinese children have grown up with their identities anchored to multiple places. Such complications have only become more acute since the 1997 handover.
On the one hand, children are publicly enjoined to love the “motherland” and embrace symbolic patriotic displays such as anthems, flags and ceremonial occasions. On the other, most Hong Kong Chinese regard at least one alternative passport, ideally from some (preferably Anglosphere) Western democracy, as highly advantageous. Few – at least privately – consider this situation objectionable.
In addition to publicly loving China, and making sure their offspring speak better-than-halting Mandarin, many Hong Kong “patriots” want to ensure they don’t actually have to live there – at least, not permanently. They also seek to discreetly park a healthy proportion of their financial assets far from “Greater China”. Close adherence to outward form, without much of the underpinning substance that gives it meaning, is a readily observable Hong Kong Chinese trait. Patriotism for their theoretical “motherland” is a case in point.
