How China’s ‘wins’ in the Ukraine war can go beyond the economy
- While China is expected to benefit economically from a weakened Russia, the US could be a bigger winner, especially in its campaign to contain China
- If the US wants China to help with Ukraine, it must respond to China’s demands for rapprochement on trade and technology. Regardless, China can play the role of peacemaker, but will have to strike a delicate balance between Russia and the West
George Kennan – a key architect of the US containment strategy against the Soviet Union – warned 25 years ago that Nato’s expansion towards the Russian border would be “the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era”. Kennan lived to see the start of the Iraq War but not the eventual fulfilment of that tragic mistake.
With the Russian market vacated by Western companies, Chinese companies can rush in to fill the gap. China could capture a share of the exodus of talent from Russia. This talent could also stay in Russia and work for Chinese employers which expand their operations from research and development to marketing.
The US could also use China’s reluctance to join the West as a way to escalate trade sanctions and other measures against Beijing. China could be forced to break its ties with Russia, and the absence of this important economic and strategic partner could increase China’s vulnerability.
If the US wants China to help with Ukraine, it must respond to China’s demands for rapprochement on trade and technology. China will weigh its interests by balancing what it can gain from the US against what it would lose on Russia. Instead, the US has done the opposite by stepping up pressure on China. Such actions constitute the main instrument the US uses to push China to join the West against Russia.
If the US was actually a righteous and compassionate nation, it would work with China to find a path towards peace in Ukraine. Instead, its obsession with China is overriding any humanitarian concerns.
Few US politicians are secure enough to jump off the anti-China bandwagon. US political leaders tend to be highly constrained in their ability to do the right thing. The “subordination of the strategic element to domestic politics” – a phrase former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger used in 2014 to describe the European Union’s stance on Ukraine – vividly captures US policies towards China.
Should China be expected to be virtuous even when it is against its own interests? That is a big ask. The primary responsibility of the Chinese government is to safeguard the long-term well-being of its 1.4 billion people. Keeping one’s own country in order comes before trying to bring peace to the world.
Nevertheless, China can be a peacemaker. Instead of behaving in the confrontational manner adopted by the West, China can discreetly nudge Russia at the right time and in the right way. China can also play an instrumental role in the long-term peace of Ukraine through reconstruction, investment and trade.
In the process, China will have to navigate a delicate balance between the West and Russia. It must reach deep into its cultural tradition to find moral courage. While not being naive about the reality of global rivalries, it needs faith that somehow justice will prevail. If it succeeds as a compassionate peacemaker, China will stand tall among the nations in the spirit of unity.
Winston Mok, a private investor, was previously a private equity investor