My Take | How pan-dems failed to put out the FIRE
- The insidious influence of the finance, insurance and real estate industries remains after the chance to abolish Legco’s functional sector seats was lost when the electoral reform package was rejected in 2015
It’s hard to argue with some pan-democrats and their supporters when all they ever do is shout about democracy and universal suffrage. I have nothing against those lofty aspirations. I just want to know how they plan on getting there besides throwing other people’s children, rather than their own, at the barricades.
In my last column, I cited the insidious influence of the finance, insurance and real estate (FIRE) industries over the government. I described this phenomenon with the well-known phrase, “regulatory capture”.
So far, so uncontroversial. But then, some pan-dem readers countered that you couldn’t reform FIRE without full democracy. That just got me into a fit.
First of all, did we learn nothing from the global financial crisis more than a decade ago? It was the “financialisation” of the mortgage and housing industries in the United States – the world’s “greatest” democracy – that triggered the subprime mortgage market collapse whose contagion spread through the global economy.
It may be worth some people’s time to read a good finance book on the crisis.