Advertisement

Opinion | Like Aung San Suu Kyi, Carrie Lam has let her one weakness overpower her better qualities

  • The Hong Kong chief executive, who has stressed her Catholic faith and has a long record of being an honest civil servant, has betrayed the expectations of Hongkongers by doing the bidding of Beijing

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Chief Executive Carrie Lam speaks to the media and urges schools, businesses and unions to think twice before going on strike in protest against the extradition bill legislation at the Chief Executive’s office in Tamar, Admiralty, on June 11. Photo: Winson Wong
Tragedy can be defined as the destruction caused when a person’s better qualities and instincts are so overwhelmed by one weakness as to betray the ideas or people for which he/she had once stood. In which case, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and Myanmar’s leader Aung San Suu Kyi are currently such tragic figures. 
Advertisement
The grim-faced chief executive has almost certainly been following orders but that merely shows that she is more concerned with staying in power than listening to the people or healing such wounds as the “umbrella movement” in 2014 reflected.
To write off the mass of opposition to the extradition bill as based on “misunderstanding”, as her underling Chief Secretary Matthew Cheung Kin-chung has done, displays nothing less than contempt not merely for the hundreds of thousands of Hongkongers who took to the streets, but the lawyers, the chambers of commerce, and the diplomats concerned about Hong Kong’s separate status.
Equally insulting is the insinuation from government sources, let alone Beijing, that this is all part of a Western plot against China. However, foreigners have less to lose than others. They can move. Not so most Hong Kong people. There is real concern, already reflected in the property market, that mainland money is worried about the economic and social stability impact of the bill.
Now, Hong Kong’s future as an international business hub has been put further at risk by Lam’s vastly excessive use of force. Like the Tiananmen Square crackdown, the administration was determined to clear the streets, whatever the cost, as the huge phalanxes of heavily armoured police officers advanced following repeated barrages of tear gas and rubber bullets. For this bystander at Admiralty, a journalist who has felt tear gas before, it was deliberately brutal.
Advertisement
Advertisement