Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong society
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Japanese dance group Avantgardey performs during the Lunar New Year parade in Tsim Sha Tsui on February 10. Avantgardey has shared videos of its activities across Hong Kong, one of which drew negative comments from internet users. Photo: Eugene Lee

Letters | How can Hong Kong be culturally confident again? Keep an open mind

  • Readers discuss the backlash against a Japanese performance of a mainland Chinese dance in Hong Kong, the Russian art of war, and airport wheelchair shortages
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.

At a time when the world’s cultural landscapes are shifting, it is disheartening to witness the dwindling cultural confidence of Hong Kong.

President Xi Jinping frequently emphasises cultural confidence, which underscores the importance of embracing one’s values.

In the 1980s and 1990s, Hong Kong was at the zenith of its cultural influence, exporting iconic films and music that resonated across Asia and establishing a profound sense of pride in its unique cultural identity.
However, a recent incident suggests a stark decline in Hong Kong’s cultural confidence. When Japanese dance group Avantgardey performed the “subject three” dance against the backdrop of Victoria Harbour, it was not celebrated as a harmonious meeting of cultures but rather drew a barrage of negative comments from Hong Kong internet users. Some felt Avantgardey should refrain from performing popular mainland Chinese dances in Hong Kong, a sentiment that starkly contrasts with the city’s once celebrated cultural openness and adaptability.

In a city that once led the region in cultural exports, the backlash against Avantgardey’s performance reveals a community uncertain about its cultural standing and identity. It is imperative for Hong Kong to work towards broadening its cultural perspective. Resting on our past laurels and confining ourselves to the familiar will not foster growth or rejuvenation of our cultural expression.

The comparison between classic Hong Kong milk tea and the increasingly popular hand-crushed lemon tea also serves as a metaphor for our cultural stagnation. Just as our culinary tastes must evolve and absorb new influences for us to remain relevant, so too must our cultural identity.

Cultivating and strengthening our cultural confidence is not just about preserving our past; it’s about enriching our future and ensuring that Hong Kong remains a vibrant and influential force on the world stage. Complacency will not lead us forward; only through embracing change and promoting cultural awareness can we hope to regain the cultural confidence that once defined us.

Yeung Man Fung, Mid-Levels

Between Russia and Nato, who’s weak and who’s strong?

I refer to the article, “What would Sun Tzu and Clausewitz think about Ukraine and Taiwan?” (February 15).

I grew up in Siberia and know that when a bear wants a hunter to think it is not aware of his presence, it tramps like a horse, but when the predator wants to attack the hunter from behind, it moves as noiselessly as a ghost.

No doubt Sun Tzu, writing The Art of War about 25 centuries ago, also noticed that. Hence his recommendation to appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.

Now the Kremlin wants the West to think the weak Russian army can’t advance in Donbas, without realising that Ukraine is becoming Nato’s white elephant.

A word to the wise: as a 60-year-old Russian, I remember my country supporting numerous warring Marxist white elephants all over the world till 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed.

Mergen Mongush, Moscow

Fix airport wheelchair shortages to prevent tragedy

I am writing to complain about a recent experience at Hong Kong International Airport. I am 77 and I’ve lived in Hong Kong since 1969. I always found the efficiency and service here to be excellent, until this experience.

I have had a hip replacement and more recently underwent lower back surgery. As a result, I find it challenging to walk long distances.

On February 16, I was travelling business class to Bangkok on CX751 and as usual requested wheelchair assistance to the boarding gate. Sadly, after a very quick check-in, I was made to wait nearly 45 minutes for the wheelchair.

Returning to Hong Kong on February 20 on CX674, the situation was even worse. There was no wheelchair at all. To my knowledge, three or four other passengers were also waiting for wheelchairs. After asking airline staff several times where the wheelchairs were, we were just told they would arrive.

After we waited for 20 minutes and with no wheelchair in sight, the staff said it was not their responsibility, but that of the Airport Authority. I told the staff I had requested wheelchair assistance through the airline, not the airport, but they would not listen.

Finally, with no other choice, the other passengers and I had to walk to immigration, which was quite painful for me, even with train access.

My questions are: who is responsible for providing wheelchairs at Hong Kong airport? If the Airport Authority or the airline does not have enough wheelchairs, shouldn’t passengers be warned and alternative arrangements made for disabled or very old people?

On February 12, an 80-year-old man at Mumbai airport didn’t get the wheelchair assistance he had requested, collapsed after walking about 1.5km to immigration and died.

Do we need to wait for such a devastating outcome in “Asia’s World City” before we rectify the situation? I really hope we can avoid this. How can we promote tourism to our city when the service at the airport alone is so terrible?

Notan H. Tolani, Tsim Sha Tsui

Post