Advertisement

Letters | Malaysia’s China pivot may make it richer – but also more vulnerable

  • Trapped between a rock and a hard place, Kuala Lumpur needs China’s market, trade and resources to shore up its stagnating economy but also faces an increased security vulnerability as a result

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
11
Malaysia’s Foreign Minister Saifuddin Abdullah (right) shakes hands with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi after a joint press conference at the foreign ministry in Putrajaya on July 12. Photo: AFP/Malaysia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification.
Advertisement

Malaysia marked its 65th year of independence two weeks ago. As it signalled its intention to become a middle-power nation, recent developments have exposed its foreign policy vulnerabilities.

Malaysia’s progress has been a mixed bag – the envy of many while also looking like a spent force to some. Over the decades, its foreign policy orientation, from being pro-West to adopting non-alignment, has produced mixed results. But its latest pivot to China puts it on a path of vulnerability.

It encourages reliance on the quick and easy solutions Beijing is happy to offer. The generous returns from the Belt and Road Initiative projects to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership are shaping up to an addictive dependence on Chinese capital and markets.

Kuala Lumpur is trapped between a rock and a hard place. It needs China’s critically vital market, trade and resources to shore up its stagnating economy and plug the systemic hole of abuses and corruption, but also faces an increased security vulnerability as an unintended trade-off.

Once wary of Beijing’s sway in local affairs, statesman Mahathir Mohamad now encourages a stronger pivot to China, accusing Washington and the West of provoking Beijing. His anti-West approach has been strategically capitalised by Beijing in amplifying China’s cultural and economic persuasion.

Advertisement