Letters | Why Hong Kong’s 21-day quarantine policy seems unscientific
- Readers question the scientific justification behind Hong Kong’s 21-day quarantine and discuss the pros and cons of a vaccine passport system

This provided me with the chance to do some data analysis and the time to think this through. However, after reviewing the facts I collected, I couldn’t find any scientific evidence supporting the 21-day quarantine policy.
The Hong Kong government requires those entering the city from countries deemed “high risk” to undergo 21 days of quarantine in a hotel on a government list. This “high risk” list now includes almost every major country in the world. Those arriving from these “high risk” countries undergo PCR tests daily in quarantine for the first seven days.
Given that a passenger to Hong Kong has taken one PCR test before and after the flight and assuming both results are negative, the most likely chance of an imported confirmed case is among passengers at the early stage of the incubation period. Therefore, I completely support performing more tests during the quarantine period to identify potential positive cases.
However, it seems there is little scientific reason for the government to enforce quarantine of more than 14 days since sufficient testing will be able to identify all the cases based on what we know about the virus.