Advertisement

The View | Forget reclamation. Hong Kong should build a floating city

  • Richard Harris says critics are right to note that massive reclamation in Lantau is too costly to be worth the returns, not to mention the risk of storms triggered by climate change. There’s a better way to make use of our coastal waters

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Stilt houses are still seen in Hong Kong’s Tai O village. Hong Kong used to have picturesque but smelly fishing villages in typhoon shelters. Could they offer lessons on how to build a modern floating city? Photo: Edward Wong

It is a universally acknowledged truth that there is an enormous amount of land in Hong Kong’s New Territories that could be developed. Sitting on a dilapidated but seaworthy boat sipping a rum recently, the whole of Tseung Kwan O lay before me as a large catchment area of poorly utilised land.

Advertisement
One would hope that the hapless Stanley Wong Yuen-fai and his Task Force on Land Supply has spotted this one, as the land area is not far short of half the size of Kowloon. A short MTR extension and it would be as big as Sha Tin or Tuen Mun, and just as convenient.
Unfortunately, his rug was well and truly pulled from under him by Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, who came out of the left field with her Lantau Tomorrow Vision plan. More a case of double vision after a New Year party, the plan is an unimaginative, and ultimately futile, way of creating more land for building. One would have thought Typhoon Mangkhut’s four-metre tidal surge and the spectre of sea-level rises due to global warming would have made the idea dead on arrival.
Not a bit of it. Lam even described concerns about the mind-numbing cost as “narrow-minded”. Well, let’s put on the blinkers and see how the project works financially. The Lantau Folly is estimated to cost HK$500 billion (US$64 billion) to build. These projects always overshoot – just ask MTR Corporation or builders of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge, and double is a good rule of thumb. A trillion-dollar project would mop up almost all our reserves. That’s a lot of hospitals, schools and comfort for the elderly – the people that made Hong Kong in the first place.

The platform itself would cost around HK$5,500 per square foot to build, which translates into at least HK$4 million for a 400 sq ft apartment. That’s 21 years’ salary for the average wage earner – as long as he spends it on nothing else!

Advertisement

In selling off the land, the government gets its money back (presumably to throw it all again into the sea). A few lucky public tenants get to live in very expensive flats and the developers get the rest to flog off at sky-high prices. Wouldn’t it be easier to give money to carefully selected low-wage earners, a slightly larger amount to the engineers, and a huge bag of cash to the property developers – and cut out the middle man?

The net result is that we have spent all our reserves and created just 15 per cent more flats than we have now. I don’t have to take my shoes and socks off to do the counting to see that it is a non-starter.

Advertisement