The West must stop its deceptive mantra of regime change in Syria and listen to the people instead
Patrik K. Meyer says the ‘Assad must go’ mantra, and vilification of his allies, is grossly biased and hides geopolitical motives, while ignoring the fact that there is no viable alternative
From the beginning of the Syrian conflict, Western governments and mainstream news outlets have been waging a deceptive media war to remove the current regime. They say it is illegitimate and ruthless, poses a threat to both Syrians and the region as a whole, and should be replaced by the leaders of the so-called Syrian revolution, who will arguably transform Syria into a country where every voice is heard and every need addressed.
These seemingly meaningful and altruistic intentions are, however, just a cover for Western governments and their allies opposed to the regime of President Bashar al-Assad, to hide their less constructive and legitimate aims.
Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin accused of using ‘starvation as weapon of war’ in Aleppo
One example of this aggressive, biased and deceitful smear campaign is the statements made by the US ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, accusing the Syrian regime and its allies of heinous crimes against humanity, and blaming them for all the suffering of the Syrian people. Regrettably, her statements were broadly reproduced unchallenged by news outlets and accepted as fact by the majority of Westerners.
Watch: Samantha Power slams the Syrian regime at the UN
To explore the validity of the West’s “Assad must go” mantra, I recently travelled to Beirut and Damascus to meet both the pro- and anti-Assad camps, and, more importantly, the silent Syrian majority blatantly ignored by Western media and governments. My six years in the Middle East, including six months in the 1980s studying Islam in Damascus, provided me with sufficient context.