Advertisement
Advertisement
Surya Deva
Surya Deva, an associate professor at City University’s School of Law, specialises in the area of business and human rights.
To deflect criticism of its initial cover-up, the Chinese government is busy presenting its model of governance as a success in containing Covid-19. China’s model offers efficiency, because unlike in democracies, there is no cost of dissent.
While companies like Cathay may not regard leaving the lucrative Chinese market as a viable option, they should not ditch their human rights responsibilities to make profits.
Advertisement
The ongoing umbrella movement has triggered a volcano of creative imagination in Hong Kong, with new ideas, governance paradigms and legal principles being tested almost every day.
Since assuming office in July 2012, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying has hardly taken a wrong step in triggering a governance crisis in Hong Kong.
Dear Leung Chun-ying, I write this open letter to request that you immediately begin dialogue with peaceful Hongkongers protesting for universal suffrage.
As students from several universities and colleges prepare for a week-long boycott of classes from next Monday, to protest against the National People's Congress Standing Committee decision on political reform for Hong Kong, the local community is responding in diverse ways.
The central government's representatives have consistently reminded us that the election of the chief executive by universal suffrage in 2017 should be strictly in accordance with the Basic Law provisions.
Amid growing fears that the National People's Congress Standing Committee might cage the universal suffrage aspirations of Hongkongers, Li Fei, chairman of the Basic Law Committee, said last week that "the person who governs Hong Kong must be a patriot" in order to safeguard national security.
Customers are always the core of McDonald's Hong Kong" . Until a few days ago, these were the words that greeted visitors to the McDonald's Hong Kong website. But this slogan has disappeared.
