-
Advertisement

Singapore court case forces carve-up, greater transparency

4-MIN READ4-MIN
SCMP Reporter

When Singaporean Eddie Taw Cheng-kong's nine-year jail sentence for accepting bribes in Hong Kong was overturned on appeal, he must have felt all his problems were evaporating.

However, the ruling meant that the troubles had just begun for Singapore's government and judiciary.

The appeal verdict in January last year not only caused a constitutional crisis in Singapore, but also sent resounding shudders through the government's S$100 billion (about HK$451.21 billion) overseas investment arm that are still being felt to this day.

Advertisement

It is widely believed that one impetus for the wide-ranging revamp of the Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC) unveiled this week stems partly from the Taw case.

It was embarrassing for the GIC that such a case could have arisen and it highlighted accountability and transparency problems.

Advertisement

The reorganisation, which took effect on April 1, has seen the GIC's real-estate and special-investments departments hived off into separate firms with specialist boards better able to keep a closer watch and offer guidance on day-to-day affairs.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x