North Korea nuclear programme: Seoul hopes Trump can learn the art of the ‘small deal’
- South’s President Moon Jae-in is pulling out the stops to revive talks on denuclearisation
- But Washington is sceptical of half-measures and Pyongyang appears intransigent
Moon’s vision of peace with North Korea goes up in smoke
“The Moon administration wants to make a breakthrough before the November election [in the US],” said Choi Kang, vice-president of the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, describing the South as “desperate” for any deal that would help it repair relations with the North. “It is their hope. But I am sceptical about the possibility of it.”
Biegun’s trip came after South Korea’s Donga newspaper reported on Monday that Seoul’s recently reshuffled national security team was pushing for Washington and Pyongyang to reach an agreement on partial denuclearisation that would leave some nuclear sites intact. The team led by Suh Hoon, the new director of the presidential Blue House’s National Security Office, has set its sights on a deal under which the US would relax sanctions on Pyongyang in exchange for the dismantling of the North’s Yongbyon nuclear facility and its intercontinental ballistic missiles, according to the newspaper. Under the “small deal plus” proposal, sanctions would snap back into place in the event of the agreement being violated, the report said, citing an anonymous diplomatic source.
The Blue House did not respond to a request for comment.
South Korea official hits out at ‘chaotic’ US approach to North
“Pyongyang has maintained denuclearisation is out of the question. So that means the regime wants the US and South Korea to accept a nuclear North Korea,” said Soo Kim, a former CIA intelligence analyst who specialised in the North. “Pyongyang has also demonstrated – especially in recent weeks – that tensions will not be eased and confrontation maintained. There have been little if any signs to suggest Pyongyang is even entertaining peaceful relations with Seoul. So if you imagine what peace and reconciliation might look like here, it’s natural for your mind to draw a blank.”
Biegun on Wednesday denied he had requested any meeting with the North during his visit, but said Washington remained committed to “continuing our work for a peaceful outcome on the Korean peninsula”.
“When Chairman Kim appoints a counterpart to me who is prepared and empowered to negotiate on these issues they will find us ready at that very moment,” Biegun said. “Dialogue can lead to action, but action is impossible without dialogue.”
In an apparent sign of support for Moon’s outreach efforts despite reported differences over sanctions relief for the North, Biegun also said Washington believed in inter-Korean cooperation as an “important component in creating a more stable environment on the Korean peninsula”.
But Nam Chang-hee, a professor of political science and international relations at Inha University, said it was doubtful Washington would ultimately accept a partial deal that could be “conveniently interpreted as de facto recognition” of North Korea as a nuclear power.
Ryo Hinata-Yamaguchi, a visiting professor at Pusan National University, said the South’s reported “small deal” offer would represent a major lowering of expectations for the US.
“The fact that North Korea has previously offered to close the Yongbyon facility already indicates that there is not much to lose for them in doing so,” Ryo said. “North Korea is known to have other enrichment plants, thus it still has the capacity to continue with its nuclear weapons programme.”