Twitter adds ‘glorifying violence’ label on Donald Trump’s Minneapolis tweet
- Twitter placed a ‘public interest notice’ on the tweet about protests in Minneapolis over the death of George Floyd at the hands of the police
- The move came hours after Trump signed an executive order threatening social media firms with new free speech regulations
.png?itok=arIb17P0)
In a late night tweet, Trump wrote: “These THUGS are dishonouring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”
Hours later, the micro-messaging platform hid the tweet behind a message that said it “violates our policies regarding the glorification of violence based on the historical context of the last line, its connection to violence, and the risk it could inspire similar actions today.”
“As is standard with this notice, engagements with the Tweet will be limited. People will be able to Retweet with Comment, but will not be able to Like, Reply or Retweet it.”
Users could still click through and view the full unedited tweet.
The “historical context” Twitter referred to is the 1960s – and Miami police chief Walter Headley’s aggressive policing of black neighbourhoods denounced at the time by civil rights leaders.
At a news conference in December 1967, as tensions simmered in response to months of police brutality, Headley told reporters: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.”
02:06
Protesters in the US demand justice for the death of George Floyd after fatal arrest
Joe Biden assailed Trump on Friday for his response to the protests in Minneapolis, saying the president is “calling for violence against American citizens during a moment of pain for so many.”
Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, tweeted that he is “furious” and “you should be too.”
A Twitter spokeswoman said CEO Jack Dorsey had been informed of the decision to tag Trump’s tweet before the label was applied. The decision was based on a policy in place since June, 2019, which the company said it had applied previously, pointing to a tweet by a Brazilian cabinet member in April this year.
The order calls on government regulators to evaluate if online platforms should be eligible for liability protection for content posted by their millions of users.
“Twitter is doing nothing about all of the lies & propaganda being put out by China or the Radical Left Democrat Party. They have targeted Republicans, Conservatives & the President of the United States. Section 230 should be revoked by Congress. Until then, it will be regulated!” Trump tweeted on Friday.
If enforced, the action would upend decades of precedent and treat internet platforms as “publishers” potentially liable for user-generated content.
Trump told reporters at the White House he acted because big tech firms “have had unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter any form of communication between private citizens or large public audiences.”
“We can’t let this continue to happen,” Trump said.
The American Civil Liberties Union called Trump’s order “a blatant and unconstitutional threat to punish social media companies that displease the president.”
Eric Goldman, director of the High-Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University, said the order was “more about political theatre than about changing the law.”
The order “is not legally supportable – it flies in the face of more than 900 court decisions,” Goldman said.
The White House seeks to sidestep the provisions giving internet firms immunity by treating them as publishers operating in part of a “public square.”
Amid Twitter fact-check row, Trump signs order against social media firms
“Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube wield immense, if not unprecedented, power to shape the interpretation of public events; to censor, delete, or disappear information; and to control what people see or do not see,” the executive order said.
While the Trump order would not prevent platforms from moderating content, it could open them up to a flood of lawsuits from anyone who claims to be harmed by content posted online.
Critics said the action represents a dangerous effort by the government to regulate online speech.
“Social media can be frustrating. But an Executive Order that would turn the FCC into the President’s speech police is not the answer,” said Jessica Rosenworcel, a Democratic member of Federal Communications Commission, one of the agencies tasked with enforcing the executive order.
Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, a trade group, warned that “retaliation against the private sector for fact-checking leadership is what we expect from foreign autocracies, not the United States.”
Violent protests over death of George Floyd spread beyond Minneapolis
Internet firms have denied Trump’s claims of bias, and point to his massive social media following. But the president’s move plays into his narrative ahead of his difficult November re-election battle that liberal forces are trying to censor Republicans.
A wider debate has long been under way on the power that social media companies wield and what responsibility they bear for posts that are misleading or hurtful.
Internet services like Twitter and Facebook have been struggling to root out misinformation, while at the same time keeping their platforms open to users.
After long resisting calls to censure Trump over his frequent factually inaccurate posts, Twitter on Tuesday flagged the president for the first time for making false claims.
Trump had tweeted – without any evidence – that more mail-in voting would lead to what he called a “Rigged Election” this November.
Additional reporting by Reuters and Bloomberg
