Tables turned as ‘aggressive’ deal on joint checkpoint in Hong Kong forged
Alternatives cast aside in favour of giving mainland officers strong powers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1777/a17770c85442f963bcdb45d1ff4c8ac108701b95" alt="Chief Executive Carrie Lam sits inside a high-speed train in Hong Kong. Photo: Felix Wong"
Eight years ago, a number of pan-democratic lawmakers were slammed by the government for asking the same question many times during a marathon Finance Committee meeting to scrutinise funding for the cross-border express rail link.
“The Basic Law has banned Hong Kong from implementing a co-location arrangement which allows Chinese Communist Party officers to enforce mainland laws in Hong Kong. This is crystal clear,” said then Civic Party lawmaker Margaret Ng Ngoi-yee, a barrister who opposed the funding.
She was joined by colleague Ronny Tong Ka-wah, who argued it was constitutionally impossible to set up such a joint checkpoint in the city centre.
“I hope the secretary [for transport and housing] will stop misleading Hongkongers,” Tong, a senior counsel, said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3ad2/e3ad2e76a409a9e719a40b7c2457b6cc5fc40d47" alt="loading"