Lunar New Year clashes in Mong Kok did not amount to riot, court told
Barrister also claims client’s presence at tense scene not enough to impose criminal liability
Unrest in Mong Kok last year did not amount to a “riot” under the law, a court heard on Friday.
Barrister Erik Shum Sze-man, who was making his closing submission at a trial of three people accused of rioting, said the city’s law defined the offence narrowly.
He was arguing for 23-year-old university student Hui Ka-ki. She, student Mak Tsz-hei, 20, and cook Sit Tat-wing, 33, face one joint charge of rioting. The three have pleaded not guilty and will face their verdicts on March 16.
On the morning of February 9, 2016, dozens of protesters gathered on the northbound lane of Nathan Road near Soy Street, according to the prosecution, following a confrontation between local crowds and police over hawker control the previous night.
On the day of the protests, police sent in reinforcements as tensions escalated.