bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

paywallTypes

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Jasmine Siu

Activist Ken Tsang Kin-chiu may not have been the person seen being assaulted by a group of apparent police officers in widely viewed footage that captured one of the most controversial scenes of the Occupy protests two years ago, a court heard on Tuesday.
That argument was deployed by six of the defence teams representing the seven policemen on trial at the District Court for ­seriously harming the social worker outside a pump station in Admiralty on October 15, 2014.
They said prosecutors failed to prove that Tsang was the victim shown in the TVB news footage, or that he was assaulted at the pump station to start with.
Tsang lucky to avoid more serious injuries in attack by policemen, court hears
They reasoned that even if Tsang had been assaulted after his arrest, the injuries were inflicted by officers other than the defendants, because none of the ­accused had been equipped with the specific baton that allegedly left 15 red bruises on Tsang.
Lawrence Lok Ying-kam SC, for Chief Inspector Wong ­Cho-shing, said prosecutors could not explain those marks.

And Cheng Huan SC, for ­Senior Inspector Lau Cheuk-ngai, added: “The only plausible explanation is that [Tsang] was not ­assaulted by the defendants.”
They also argued that Tsang could have been injured during his arrest, as he had put up a struggle, and that the poor quality of the footage meant no positive identification can safely be made.
Prosecutors had relied on Tsang’s claim that there was no change of guard to place all of them at the pump station.
128 days in ‘China’s Guantanamo’: writer tells of secret detention after Occupy Central visit
But Lok said the segmented clip showed a different formation of people escorting and carrying a person between shots. Counsel Edwin Choy said it would be wholly unsafe to rely on Tsang, whom he described as an ­“opportunistic witness”.
Cheng said the prosecution case rested almost entirely on Tsang’s credibility and reliability. “The other evidence ... is in itself incapable of supporting a conviction,” he told Judge David Dufton.
Hong Kong cinemas won’t show Occupy documentary, filmmaker fears
The seven defendants are Wong, 49; Lau, 30; Detective Sergeant Pak Wing-bun, 43; and constables Lau Hing-pui, 39; Wong Wai-ho, 38; Chan Siu-tan, 32; and Kwan Ka-ho, 33. They denied one joint count of causing grievous bodily harm with intent. Chan ­denies an extra count of common assault.
The trial continues.


Former jailed ringleader of Hong Kong’s Occupy movement Shiu Ka-chun reveals cancer battle

Nothing brings Hongkongers and mainland Chinese closer together than sports

Former Hong Kong politician ‘major backer’ of firearms purchase from US in ‘Dragon Slaying Brigade’ plot, court hears

Article 23 and the tragedy of Hong Kong

Occupy Central

Video may not show Ken Tsang being beaten, accused Hong Kong police officers claim

The seven police officers accused of beating Ken Tsang arrive at court. Photo: Sam Tsang

Occupy activist Ken Tsang Kin-chiu stands trial for assaulting cops at Kowloon City Court. 11APR16 SCMP/ David Wong

News

Hong Kong

Law and Crime

Defence says prosecution case rests almost entirely on activist’s credibility
