Advertisement
Advertisement
US-China relations
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
US Trade Representative Katherine Tai speaks about the need for more resilient global supply chains at the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework ministerial meeting in Detroit, Michigan, on May 27. Photo: AFP

‘Anxiety’ over new US trade policy focused on American workers, cutting China reliance: Katherine Tai

  • Past championing of market liberalisation led to fragile supply chains, production abroad and Beijing’s clout, says Washington’s top trade official
  • Tai acknowledged encountering some resistance to the new US tack yet cautioned that ‘complacency really isn’t an option’
Washington’s top trade official acknowledged encountering resistance and “anxiety” in promoting the Biden administration’s new vision of a trade policy focused on American workers while it slashes reliance on China.

US Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Thursday said “fragile supply chains” and “an unsustainable version of globalisation” were negative outcomes from decades of championing market liberalisation and low prices for consumers as domestic manufacturing suffered.

“When efficiency and low cost are the only motivators, production moves outside our borders,” Tai said in a speech at the National Press Club in Washington.

Such an approach, she continued, meant production was “increasingly consolidated in one economy, such as the PRC, which manipulates cost structures, controls key industries, and became a dominant supplier for many important goods and technologies”.

Pursuing de-risking and resilience in supply chains was about “improving national security and reducing opportunities for economic coercion”, she added.

In a direct message to Beijing, Tai singled out “consuming” rather than “exporting and supplying” as an American “superpower” that the US needed to employ in deciding how to “leverage the power of access into our markets”.

However, Tai acknowledged encountering some resistance domestically to the new US tack yet cautioned that “complacency really isn’t an option”. Some allies have also balked, like India, which last month opted not to take part in trade negotiations at the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework ministerial meeting in Detroit, Michigan.

Turning away from past practices was difficult, she said, noting that “there’s a certain comfort to hanging on to the old structures and the old ways because they’re comfortable”.

China fights US ‘de-risking’ with first-ever supply chain expo

“There’s one vein of anxiety and negativity that I encountered [that says] … you are just trying to take apart the system, you’re trying to take us back to a state of nature. And that is absolutely not what we are trying to do”.

Tai’s comments followed an observation shared by Republican congressman Tom Cole of Oklahoma lamenting America’s formal withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a US initiative to expand trade across the Asia-Pacific region.

Abandoning the TPP “was a missed opportunity”, Cole said during a House Rules Committee hearing last month on China’s economic tactics.

In 2016, US President Joe Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, withdrew the US from the 12-member TPP, now called the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, in the name of protecting domestic manufacturing and American workers. The initial deal was signed during the Barack Obama administration to counter China’s rise.

But Tai stressed that the Biden administration was doing “non-traditional things” that “promote resilience, sustainability and inclusiveness in terms of economic outcomes” because it saw “significant limitations” in “liberalisation qualification for the sake of liberalisation”.

Her remarks came just hours before US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was expected in Beijing for a five-day visit. Blinken’s trip would be the first by an American secretary of state since 2018.
Blinken is slated to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. Previously scheduled for February, the visit was abruptly cancelled after an alleged Chinese spy balloon was spotted and downed over American territory.
While many analysts hailed the trip as a breakthrough in US-China relations after deep communication fissures emerged between the two global powers, Tai at a separate appearance on Thursday described it as “ordinary”.

Detroit, recent Apec host city, embodies Biden’s trade policy goal of renewal

“For those of us in the administration, it is just the usual course of business in ordinary conduct, that we have communication channels,” she said.

On Wednesday, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink voiced Washington’s aim of managing its competition with Beijing “in the most responsible way possible”.

“Intense competition requires intense diplomacy, if we’re going to manage tensions,” he said.

13