Advertisement
Advertisement
People visit the ancient city wall in Xian in northwest China’s Shaanxi province on April 30. China’s growing middle class offers a massive market and a strong incentive for foreign companies to remain in the country. Photo: AFP.
Opinion
Macroscope
by Tai Hui
Macroscope
by Tai Hui

De-risking from China: companies and countries have different goals

  • Businesses might use similar ‘de-risking’ rhetoric to some governments, but their priorities are different as they try to stay connected to a critical market
  • Many foreign firms already derive a large part of their revenue from China, and the country’s infrastructure lets them produce at scale and deliver on time

There is no hiding that China’s relationship with the West, especially the United States, has become more complicated in the past decade. At the state level, there is strategic competition in the technology and finance sectors, as well as China’s expanding influence in geopolitics.

The Ukraine war has exacerbated differences between China and the West, with China maintaining its comprehensive strategic partnership, including economic ties, with Russia.
At the business level, the trade war between the US and China that began during the Trump administration has expanded to export restrictions on hi-tech products that could be used in developing artificial intelligence and advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Foreign businesses also experienced supply chain disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The growing tensions between the world’s two superpowers are raising alarm bells with companies that have business interests across the world.

These shifts in relationships require both governments and businesses to adjust their strategies. This is where a flurry of D-words comes into play, including deglobalisation, decoupling and de-risking.

De-risking is perhaps the most popular strategy now since US and European officials have come to realise the reality of trade and investment links with China.
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, is a strong advocate of this de-risking concept, having suggested reducing Europe’s economic dependence on China while not fully severing ties. This narrative has been echoed by officials in the US and elsewhere.

02:36

French and EU leaders urge China to ‘bring Russia to its senses’ and stop invasion of Ukraine

French and EU leaders urge China to ‘bring Russia to its senses’ and stop invasion of Ukraine
While states and businesses might loosely apply these broad concepts to their strategies, what they want to achieve in practice can be very different. Governments are prioritising national security, which means we could see more export restrictions on hi-tech products that could be put to military use.
There will also be greater scrutiny of Chinese business investment in strategically sensitive sectors. Western governments are also trying to do more by themselves, such as securing the production of rare earth minerals that go into batteries and other electronic components
Businesses want to manage their supply chain risks while maintaining their connections with China. The diversification of supply chains could bring more investment to other emerging markets.

With pandemic-related travel restrictions being lifted across Asia, multinational companies can accelerate their assessment of possible new production locations.

Dell’s plan to phase out China-made chips to accelerate global tech decoupling

That said, many of these multinational firms are not leaving China for two reasons. First, China continues to be a critical market for them. According to research group Rhodium, direct European investment in China’s automotive sector hit €6.2 billion (US$6.8 billion) in 2022.

This reflects the current scale of the Chinese car market as well as the rising competition from domestic carmakers, especially in electric vehicles.

Of the 10.5 million new electric vehicles that were sold globally in 2022, almost 60 per cent of them were sold in China. Many international firms already derive a significant part of their revenue from this important market.
With an expanding middle class, China continues to serve as a growth engine for these companies.

Second, while it is understandable that companies want to diversify their supply chains to reduce potential disruptions, China’s logistics infrastructure remains competitive and allows these businesses to produce at a large scale and deliver on time.

Gantry cranes at the Kwai Tsing Container Terminals in Hong Kong on March 13. Photo: Bloomberg

China, including Hong Kong, has seven out of the top 10 biggest container ports in the world in 2021, according to the World Shipping Council. For other emerging economies to pick up some market share from China, investment in infrastructure will need to accelerate to provide the appropriate logistics.

A good leader plans for tough times and contingencies while conducting business as usual. Operations in China are already an important component of many international companies.

This means that company leaders are more likely to manage the risks to their businesses of operating in China instead of disengaging from the Chinese economy and market altogether.

Tai Hui is chief market strategist for the Asia-Pacific at JP Morgan Asset Management

Post