In crowded, consumerist Hong Kong, can we learn to build and live with less?
- Building more efficiently would minimise waste and maximise space. And when we understand that the most essential things are not material goods taking up space, we can re-evaluate how much living area we really need
“Less is more!” This is how Ludwig Mies van der Rohe – “Mies” in the architectural world – described the essence of the International Style he pioneered in the 1920s. Even if they were unfamiliar with the architectural icon and stylistic jargon, most people would have heard of this catchphrase, used in the minimalist movement or pop culture.
But less of what, more of what? Mies aspired to build with only the necessary structural components to define and enclose architectural space. “Less” is about reducing materials, clutter and decorative elements that are superfluous to the building’s construction.
What resulted are large interior volumes, full-height glazing and clean planes from floors and walls to ceilings. “More”, meanwhile, is about maximising spatial quality, daylight, connection to nature and flexible usage.
Some consider “less is more” to be synonymous with minimalism, but it should be closer to essentialism: keeping optimal, meaningful and vital elements for the best outcome. This concept is particularly relevant in today’s environmentally conscious world and more effective than any retrospective sustainability measures because of the proactive approach of consuming less right at the beginning.
In design and construction, the Building Information Model (BIM) industry offers tools for architects, engineers and contractors to build more efficiently by minimising material wastage and labour, reducing construction time and lowering project costs.
We realised we could only survive the seven, 14 or 21 quarantine days in a hotel room because we could connect with our close friends and families. We learned that being able to go outdoors for a run or simply a breath of fresh air without wearing a mask is priceless. None of these are luxurious goods; they are edible, spiritual or intangible.
According to guidelines by the Japanese government – a country confronting micro-living challenges as much as Hong Kong, if not more – a person should be able to live comfortably in at least 25 sq m (269 sq ft) of residential space, although the ideal is 430 sq ft.
The minimum size set by our government is slightly more generous than Japan’s but it might wish to say whether this is for a single occupant as opposed to a family of two or more.
Given a reasonable flat size, comfort can be a matter of how the occupant uses the space. Consuming and living with less is a decision, and the Latin origin of the word combines de, meaning “off”, and cis or cid, meaning “to cut” or “to kill”. Just as Mies decided to maximise spatial potential through his architecture, we can choose a more sustainable and productive way to live.
Dennis Lee is a Hong Kong-born, America-licensed architect with 22 years of design experience in the US and China