Why Chinese pleasure over the US fiasco in Afghanistan will be short-lived
- When the Schadenfreude over this moment of US defeat wears off, China will see that neither America’s withdrawal nor the Taliban’s resurgence are in its best interest
- Although Chinese officials have been engaging the Taliban, the Islamist group makes for a strange partner
There have been recriminations from Republicans and Democrats, from adversaries and allies, over the US withdrawal and the chaotic scenes at Kabul airport.
China’s state media and netizens have largely lapped up this moment of American defeat. As Helen Raleigh wrote in the Federalist, “in the larger geopolitical context, the real biggest winner in Afghanistan is the Chinese Communist Party”.
European allies, whose partnership Biden has prioritised in his foreign policy and China policy especially, are disappointed by the execution of the US withdrawal.
But when the Schadenfreude wears off, China will find that neither the US withdrawal from Afghanistan nor the resurgence of the Taliban are ultimately in its best interest.
When I was in elementary school in China in the 1930s, I remember learning about Zhang Qian’s expedition to central Asia, including present-day Afghanistan, in the Han dynasty.
Time for China to stop hedging its bets in Afghanistan
While this expedition is remembered mostly for establishing the Silk Road, the trade route linking China with the West, Zhang also shared his experience of the rivalries and conflicts that dominated the region; China’s engagement there was focused on trade, not conquest.
Modern China’s ties with Afghanistan were strengthened by a Friendship and Mutual Non-Aggression Treaty in 1960.
Afghanistan’s neutrality in the Cold War stood in the way of greater Sino-Afghan cooperation, at least until the Soviet invasion in 1979, after which the Chinese helped the US in its covert operations to arm the mujahideen rebels.
The Taliban first emerged in the mid-1990s amid the chaos following the Soviet withdrawal in 1989. In 1996, the Taliban declared an Islamic Emirate, and the nation became a hub for terrorist groups including al-Qaeda.
The Taliban won. Here’s what that could mean
China took tentative steps to engage the Taliban. A Chinese delegation was in Kabul negotiating with the Taliban on September 11, 2001, leading to scrutiny of China’s ties with the group.
The Taliban’s harbouring of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the orchestrator of the September 11 attacks, prompted the US invasion in October 2001, through which the Taliban was overthrown.
Meanwhile, China was busy modernising its military and gaining a strategic foothold in the South China Sea. As Biden pointed out in his speech defending the withdrawal, China “would love nothing more than the United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention into stabilising Afghanistan indefinitely”.
China needs better friends than Taliban to make most of its rise
Yet the Taliban is not a natural partner for China. Beijing’s infrastructure programme, the Belt and Road Initiative, has largely bypassed Afghanistan.
When the dust settles in Kabul, it is possible that Biden will regain his foreign policy credibility. The US presence in Afghanistan was very unpopular with the American public, and despite the disarray of the withdrawal, early public opinion polls have found most Americans agreeing with the decision.
Thus, Beijing should not count on the Afghanistan withdrawal, however controversial and botched, to taint the remainder of Biden’s presidency or undermine his efforts to confront China.
The future of Afghanistan remains uncertain and largely depends on whether the Taliban reinstalls a regime similar to the one 20 years ago, and whether it again allows international terrorist movements to flourish within its borders.
It is far too early to tell what is going to happen, but China is unlikely to celebrate the US’ embarrassment for too long. As Andrew Small of the German Marshall Fund, a Washington think tank, told The Wall Street Journal, “China would really prefer not to be dealing with any of this.”
Chi Wang, a former head of the Chinese section of the US Library of Congress, is president of the US-China Policy Foundation