Advertisement
Advertisement
Illustration: Craig Stephens
Opinion
Benjamin Poon and Zhigang Tao
Benjamin Poon and Zhigang Tao

For a Hong Kong in flux, a dual strategy for reinventing its economy

  • The city must move on from the ‘front shop, back factory’ model built around low-cost production in China
  • It should aim instead at becoming a base for mainland firms managing global operations, and also develop products targeting the mainland market
As Hong Kong begins the process of selecting its leader for the sixth time since returning to the motherland, it is also time for the city to find new growth models in response to a changing world.

Hong Kong has been fortunate in its opportunities to reinvent itself in the last 70 years. In the 1950s, amid restrictions on trade with mainland China, Hong Kong built its manufacturing capability with capital and know-how from Shanghai industrialists, and exported its own industrial output to the world.

In the late 1970s, as it lost competitiveness due to rising production costs, Hong Kong moved factories northwards, creating the “front shop, back factory” model and transforming its economy into a centre of producer services, particularly finance, trade and related services.

Since the late 2000s, however, there have been some seismic changes in the global economy. One change is the slow growth in Hong Kong’s traditional markets (North America and Europe) after 2008. The other is the rising costs of production on the mainland.

These changes undermine the growth model of using low-cost production on the mainland to help China export to the world (the essence of “front shop, back factory”). These changes have become even more pronounced in recent years, with US tariffs on Chinese goods, supply chain disruption and the economic impact of the pandemic.

07:08

Tough times ahead for survivors of Hong Kong’s industrial past

Tough times ahead for survivors of Hong Kong’s industrial past

Even if some of the mainland-based companies manage to keep their export competitiveness, they are increasingly exporting directly to the world, instead of indirectly via Hong Kong, which poses serious challenges to the city’s pillar industries such as trade and logistics.

There are two possible strategies in response to these changes. One is to help Hong Kong-invested industrial firms as well as mainland manufacturing firms to stay export competitive, while remaining focused on the traditional Western markets. It generally involves relocating part of production to countries in South and Southeast Asia to avoid US tariffs (the so-called “China Plus One” strategy).

This will help Hong Kong become the place for mainland firms to manage their global operations, which will be a step up from Hong Kong’s existing role as a centre for financial services. It requires our universities to equip our students with knowledge of Asian businesses and economies, an area where cities like Singapore are way ahead.

The other growth model is to focus on the mainland as a market instead of as a factory of the world. After some 40 years of economic growth, mainland China is generally the largest or second largest market in virtually every single product category. Yet Hong Kong plays a very small role in helping the mainland to import.

For this second growth model to work, Hong Kong needs to develop better products to meet the demand of increasingly discerning mainland consumers, for which Hong Kong needs to increase its R&D expenditure and become a centre of innovation as proposed in the 14th five-year plan.

There seems to be some scepticism about Hong Kong’s role in innovation and hi-tech manufacturing. It is important to recall that, through relocating production northwards in the late 1980s and the associated transfer of capital and know-how (the reverse of what Shanghai industrialists did for Hong Kong in the 1950s), Hong Kong played an instrumental role in transforming the eastern part of Guangdong (including Shenzhen, Dongguan and Huizhou) into the world’s factory and then to a centre of hi-tech manufacturing.

More importantly, recent research by the HKU Business School finds that there is much more Hong Kong can contribute to the next phase of development of this region.

We find that the Pearl River Delta lags behind the Yangtze River Delta in both newly granted patents and the cumulative number of patents, one possible reason being that there are much fewer universities in the Pearl River Delta.

Moreover, the relatively fewer patents granted to the Pearl River Delta are concentrated in just two industries, electronics and telecommunications, and they are further held by just a few firms, with ZTE, Huawei and Foxconn among the top five patent assignees of the entire Pearl River Delta.

While this concentration of research and development activities may yield benefits of industrial agglomeration and regional specialisation, it also brings the risk of overreliance on just a few firms. The recent sanctions on ZTE and Huawei by the United States are a warning which should be taken seriously.
There is thus an urgent need for the region to enhance the competitiveness of its hi-tech industries by diversifying. Hong Kong has some of the best universities in Asia, which can help the Pearl River Delta move up the value chain and diversify into other industries such as biomedical and materials sciences.
It is also time for Hong Kong to give hi-tech manufacturing a chance within its borders. Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po mentioned just a few days ago that there is much more we can do with New Territories North, the size of which rivals that of Hong Kong Island.

New Territories North has the advantage of being near the hi-tech centre of Shenzhen, which has increasingly high land costs. Through public-private partnerships, we can develop this area into a hi-tech zone with ample labs, linkages with world-class universities, state-of-the-art factories, and eco-friendly residential blocks.

It will also enhance Hong Kong’s role as the centre of financial services for hi-tech as well as traditional firms.

The world has changed, and so must Hong Kong. And with the various challenges and opportunities posed by the ever-changing geopolitical and economic situations within the Asia-Pacific region and across the globe, Hong Kong’s strategic importance to China’s rise cannot be overstated.

Hong Kong’s “front shop, back factory” model has run its course, which has dire consequence for its trade and logistics industries. While financial services will thrive in view of possible financial decoupling between China and the US, it is time for Hong Kong to find its role in the increasingly decoupled world by riding on China’s dual circulation strategy, whether it is helping mainland firms to manage their global operations (external circulation) or innovating to serve an increasingly important domestic market (internal circulation).

Benjamin Poon is a graduate from the University of Hong Kong’s Bachelor of Business Administration (Law) and Bachelor of Laws programme

Zhigang Tao is a professor of global economy and business strategy at HKU

Post