Why Britain’s foreign secretary is no friend to Hong Kong and the rule of law
- If Dominic Raab is genuinely concerned about the national security law for Hong Kong, he should be encouraging British judges to remain on the city’s Court of Final Appeal so they can help ensure just outcomes
Since 1997, the British foreign secretary has presented a report on Hong Kong to Parliament every six months. Initially, these reports were reasoned and constructive, and generally supportive of the “one country, two systems” paradigm.
When problems arose, they were realistically assessed, and placed in context. With the growth, however, of anti-China sentiment in the West, this balance has disappeared and the reports have become increasingly tendentious and unreliable.
The Joint Declaration said nothing whatsoever about national security, which is unsurprising as it involves China’s own defence interests. Indeed, Britain never proposed, and China never agreed, that Hong Kong would be denied the laws required to defend itself from subversive activities or terrorism, or to protect the nation.
Under China’s constitution, national security is always a matter for the country as a whole, just as it is in Britain, and any attempt to rewrite history is readily foiled by the fine print of the Joint Declaration itself.
04:18
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam still believes she did the right thing in trying to pass extradition bil
In consequence, fugitives can now flee the city and claim safe haven in Britain. Raab has yet to explain how, criminals apart, this benefits anybody anywhere.
The arrangement has resulted in judgments of the highest quality. The court itself has benefited from the input of eminent jurists from elsewhere, and their presence has also promoted public confidence in the rule of law.
What police complaints case ruling says about Hong Kong’s judiciary
Despite this, Raab has declared that he plans to speak to Lord Reed about “whether it continues to be appropriate for British judges to sit as non-permanent judges on the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal”.
Although this will delight those on the hard right of the Conservative Party, it will play less well with those, including Hong Kong government opponents, who believe that foreign judges contribute greatly to the success of the common law in Hong Kong, and help protect fundamental freedoms.
If Raab is genuinely concerned about the national security law, he should be encouraging the British judges to remain, so that when cases reach their court, they can help ensure just outcomes.
04:55
How will the national security law change education in Hong Kong?
If, moreover, Raab really wants to pick a fight in the Far East, let him try his luck with two other former British colonies, Malaysia and Singapore.
In his eagerness to confront Beijing, he obviously sees Hong Kong as collateral damage. His report will certainly not help the city, and may actually harm it. In these difficult times, Hong Kong needs genuine friends, not politicians with agendas of their own.
Grenville Cross SC is a criminal justice analyst