Advertisement
Advertisement
Zhang Yuhuan (front, second from right), gathers with his family after spending almost 27 years in prison before having his conviction overturned on August 4. After multiple appeals, the Supreme People’s Court in Jiangxi province threw out Zhang’s conviction over lack of evidence. Photo: Weibo
Opinion
Opinion
by Lijia Zhang
Opinion
by Lijia Zhang

Zhang Yuhuan case shows China’s need to prevent wrongful convictions

  • High-profile cases have revealed gaps in China’s legal system: coerced confessions, misidentification of bodies, conflicting statements and lack of evidence
  • Authorities must take a careful look at what went wrong in Zhang’s case, punish those responsible and consider ways to avoid wrongful convictions in the future
Imagine being locked up for 27 years for a crime you didn’t commit. That was what happened to farmer Zhang Yuhuan. Fortunately, the wheel of fortune has just turned for him.

The Supreme People’s Court in the eastern province of Jiangxi declared Zhang not guilty on August 4 in a retrial, based on a lack of sufficient evidence. In the past few days, Chinese media has been awash with his tale. There have been tear-soaked images of his reunion with his ageing mother, his ex-wife who fought hard for his release and his two grown sons, whom he last saw as toddlers. 

Zhang was jailed for 9,778 days – nearly 27 years – and is believed to be the longest-serving wrongly convicted prisoner in China. He was arrested in October 1993 after two boys in Touling village were found dead and police suspected Zhang, a neighbour of the victims, had strangled and killed them.

He received a suspended death sentence from the Nanchang Intermediate People’s Court in January 1995 that was commuted to life imprisonment after two years. Zhang said he was forced to make false confessions after being tortured and threatened by police during interrogation.

Zhang has always maintained his innocence, and his family have repeatedly appealed to all relevant legal departments and every level of courts. Two months after the initial sentencing, the Jiangxi Supreme People’s Court heard his appeal and ordered a retrial that, in 2001, upheld the original verdict. The case was reopened last year, pushed by his family and a defence lawyer.

On the day I heard this news, I happened to listen to The Death Row Book Club, a BBC radio documentary about an American man who created a book club while on death row. He spent 28 years in jail while innocent of a double murder.

Zhang Yuhuan, right, embraces his son Zhang Baogang upon his return home after his conviction for murder was overturned almost 27 years after the initial verdict. Photo: Weibo

Wrongful convictions are not unique to China, of course, but there do seem to be a lot, including several high-profile cases in recent decades.

In 1994, farmer Zhang Zaiyu had a fight with her husband She Xianglin and ran away. A few months later, a bloated woman’s body was found in a pond near their village in Hubei province. She Xianglin was arrested and convicted of murder. He served 11 years in prison until the supposed victim turned up alive.
There was a similar case in Henan. In 1999, farmer Zhao Zuohai was sentenced for killing a fellow villager who disappeared after a fight between the men. Zhao also served 11 years before the vanished villager reappeared in 2010.

These cases sparked heated discussion in Chinese media as well as among legal experts on how China could better prevent the miscarriage of justice. Experts have made a case study of She’s ordeal as it is a telling example of what can go wrong in China’s legal system – coerced confessions, misidentification of a body, conflicting statements and almost non-existent evidence.

It is widely claimed that Chinese police often rely on torture to extract confessions out of suspects. With tears in his eyes, Zhang Yuhuan said he was hung and beaten with an electric baton.

I wasn’t surprised. While researching Lotus, my novel about prostitution, I heard many harrowing stories from sex workers about how they were beaten, burned with cigarettes, sprayed with high-pressure jets in winter and deprived of sleep.

Partly in response to the embarrassing high-profile cases, China has launched a crackdown on forced confessions and made serious efforts to eliminate cases that are entirely pinned on a suspect’s confession. Zhang Yuhuan is a case in point – the evidence found at the crime scene was insufficient, as Zhang’s lawyer argued at his recent retrial.

03:14

Chinese police release video of Simon Cheng ‘confession’ after his claim of torture in detention

Chinese police release video of Simon Cheng ‘confession’ after his claim of torture in detention

Even so, forced confessions continue to undermine China’s judicial system. Its Communist-Party-run courts still have one of the highest conviction rates in the world.

As part of a campaign to strengthen the legal system, the authorities have re-emphasised the legal principle of presumption of innocence, which was first established in China in 1996. Despite its long history and culture, China actually has a young and maturing legal system.

Its first modern criminal law promulgated in 1979 didn’t even address the presumption of innocence – a common presumption in many other countries and a key principle in preventing the miscarriage of justice.

In the wake of Zhang’s release, the Global Times sang the government’s praises, stating that “the overturning of such cases reflects the progress of China's judicial system over the years”. I do believe China has made great progress since reforming and opening up in 1978.

Another significant move was the 2007 restoration of the Supreme People’s Court’s authority in reviewing and approving all death penalty cases, a vital measure in averting catastrophic wrongful convictions. However, whether the legal reforms introduced over the years have actually been implemented remains in question.

To safeguard against wrongful conviction, further reforms are needed. Some have called for establishing an independent review body that combines inquisitorial and adversarial functions. Also, suspects must be granted the right to remain silent.

Zhang Yuhuan has endured untold suffering, as has his family. His desperate wife was forced to remarry and his sons grew up without their father.

Apart from congratulating themselves, the authorities must take a careful look at what went wrong in Zhang’s case, punish those responsible and consider ways to avoid wrongful convictions in the future. It would be a great comfort for Zhang and his family.

Lijia Zhang is a rocket factory worker turned social commentator and the author of a novel, Lotus

Post