Advertisement
Advertisement
An Airbus A350-1000 XWB taxis behind a Qatar Airways’ Boeing 777-300 at the Farnborough International Airshow in Britain on July 17, 2018. Photo: EPA-EFE
Opinion
The View
by Niro Sivanathan
The View
by Niro Sivanathan

As Boeing looks set to be bested by Airbus, lessons from the tennis court might explain the American firm’s ‘unforced’ errors

  • Research has found that established sports players tend to be intimidated into making mistakes when faced with opponents who have risen rapidly in the rankings. Market leaders are vulnerable to the same dynamic
Aircraft manufacturer Airbus has received a significant boost to its order book this year, particularly from Asian carriers such as India’s IndiGo, Vietnam’s VietJet Aviation and the Philippines’ Cebu Air. These, combined with handsome orders worldwide, will see Airbus storm ahead of its rival Boeing, which used to be regarded as the larger, more commercially successful aircraft manufacturer.
While Boeing was founded more than 50 years before Airbus came into being, in recent times, the two manufacturers have been competing head to head, slugging it out over some of the toughest years the industry has experienced after September 11, the severe acute respiratory syndrome crisis and rising oil prices. In the years following these events, the aviation industry proved resilient and the fortunes of Boeing and Airbus grew with the surge in demand for air travel.
And now Airbus is set to overtake Boeing’s commercial jet sales for the first time since 2012, as the US company reported a slump in deliveries of new commercial jet airliner after two fatal crashes involving its 737 MAX.  

Is this a classic case of a younger rival intimidating an older, better established competitor, resulting in the established player making mistakes and, in this particular instance, losing a long-held leadership position? There are innumerable instances of this in sports.

A recent example of how overwhelmingly positive news about an up-and-coming competitor can intimidate an established player is this year’s Wimbledon women’s singles final. Simona Halep, the seventh seed, defeated multiple Grand Slam champion Serena Williams 6–2, 6–2 to claim the title.
In a recent study of more than 117,000 professional tennis matches, we found professional tennis players, such as Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, perform worse and commit more unforced errors when they compete against players who have recently risen in their rankings, compared to those with similar rankings but who lack the same momentum.

When we abandoned tennis courts and analysed more than 5 million games from online amateur chess platforms, we found that when competitors are evenly matched, chess players perform worse against opponents they know have been climbing in the rankings.

Kings and pawns: politics cast shadow over Saudi chess tournament

As players rise in rank and reputation, they garner what social scientists call “status momentum”. Upward momentum in an opponent’s career has the power to threaten even established, well-known athletes.

Our study further discovered that those who attained recent success are associated with positive momentum – they are expected to continue doing well in the future.

Reigning world chess champion Norway’s Magnus Carlsen (right) hits the clock as he plays in the tiebreak matches of the 2018 World Chess Championship against challenger US player Fabiano Caruana in London on November 28, 2018. Analysis of online amateur chess platforms found that chess players perform worse against opponents they know have been rising in the rankings than those whose positions have remained stable. Photo: AFP

In tennis, for example, we discovered that players committed more double faults when facing an opponent with status momentum. This type of unforced error suggests that the player’s mental game was faltering. This theory poses a counterpoint to the widely debated “hot hand” concept in sports psychology that suggests a player’s positive momentum can heighten her own performance. Instead, our research examines how a player’s momentum can actually influence the performance of her opponents.

In addition to analysing amateur chess players and players on the Association of Tennis Professionals circuit, we tested our theory with more than 1,800 online research participants. Participants faced various competitive scenarios and took tests to measure how threatened they felt. Results showed they were more threatened by upwardly mobile opponents than by opponents with the same rank who lacked momentum.

Roger Federer (right) and Rafael Nadal embrace after Federer won their Wimbledon men’s singles semifinal match on July 12. Photo: AFP

And so too in business, those holding an enviable position at the top of an industry can falter when observing the sudden rise of a competitor. Market leaders are frequently the target of competitors that want to gain market share, and will use tactics such as imitating services and prices to gain customers.

These rising companies can intimidate those at the top into committing “unforced” errors. For example, General Motors long held the status of world’s largest car company, but poor product decisions and battling higher costs nearly took the company down, thereby helping rival Toyota become the world No 1.

Established companies or players can take comfort in the fact that the table can always turn again. These positions are dynamic and ever fluctuating – both due to the actual movements of players, but also because of the errors made by others who are influenced by the movement of still other players.

Dr Niro Sivanathan, an associate professor of organisational behaviour at the London Business School. He is a co-author of “Doppler Effect in Status Competition: The Impact of Status Momentum within Rank Ordered Hierarchies”

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Fear of the challenger
Post