Trump’s national security strategy is a welcome shift away from ‘war on terror’ policies
Michael Edesess says a recent speech by US Defence Secretary James Mattis focusing on China and Russia as adversaries is actually something to celebrate, because it shifts focus from the post-9/11 policies that damaged the US’ security and reputation
Mattis said: “We will continue to prosecute the campaign against terrorists that we’re engaged in today, but great power competition, not terrorism , is now the primary focus of US national security” (emphasis added).
When the future histories of the US are written, these words – uttered by Mattis in his uncharismatic fashion – will mark a memorable turning point in US policy.
For the past 16 years, the US has entrapped itself in vicious internal disputes, wrong-headed policies and actions that resulted directly from the 9/11 attacks.
Osama bin Laden must be chortling in his grave, as the US political disruptions that were the goal of the attacks have been as effective as they possibly could be.
Muslims hold Friday prayers outside White House to protest Donald Trump’s Jerusalem move
The overreaction has further sullied US commitment, not only to human rights, but to the privacy of US citizens.
Mattis is often considered by Trump sceptics to be the most adult of the “adults in the room” in the presidential entourage.
On January 19, in an adult, bluster-free manner, he quietly declared the 16-year self-destructive overreaction to 9/11 at an end. He said that instead, national security policy will focus on dangers arising from great powers.
The US security strategy falls short, but not for the reasons cited by Trump critics
Trump targets Russia, China as US rivals in new security strategy
Trump’s posture makes relations with Beijing no easier
Citizens of the US should respond to Mattis’ statement with a hearty sigh of “good riddance”. The blight on US policy and national character since 9/11 has taken a significant toll. The damage that bin Laden wrought was successful in weakening the US, not so that it is vulnerable to a new Islamic caliphate as bin Laden intended, but to another new rising power.
The danger, of course, is that the US will demonise the new enemies in unhelpful ways. Let us hope the new policy views them as competitors, not enemies, and that it will be in the hands of adults.
Michael Edesess is chief investment strategist of Compendium Finance, adjunct associate professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and a research associate of the Edhec-Risk Institute