bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Alex Lo

I am intrigued by the clarification in this newspaper today. It says: "The report … referred to Tel Aviv as Israel's capital. The city is considered Israel's financial and business capital."
The question you naturally ask is: so which city is Israel's capital?
This is an issue that plagues many a newspaper that remains neutral in reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
In 2012, The Guardian experienced the same problem. If you wonder why our correction is so short, well, it's partly because explaining any more, like The Guardian did, would invite trouble.
In April that year, the left-leaning British newspaper ran a correction apologising for "wrongly" identifying Jerusalem as Israel's capital in a photo caption. Its style guide at the time referred to Tel Aviv as the country's capital.
The correction led Honest Reporting, a pro-Israel group in Britain, to complain to the Press Complaints Commission. The commission initially supported The Guardian, but after Honest Reporting threatened to launch a judicial review, the commission relented and asked the paper to defend its position.
That led The Guardian to revise its style guide in August, acknowledging it was wrong to call Tel Aviv Israel's capital. The revised guide states: "Jerusalem is the seat of government and Tel Aviv is the country's diplomatic and financial centre."
However, it also insisted that Jerusalem is not the capital either because it is not recognised as such by the international community.
It's worth noting here that even the United States, Israel's closest ally, does not recognise Jerusalem as the capital. Israel took East Jerusalem from Jordan during the six-day war of 1967, thereby taking control of the entire holy city.
The Knesset, Israel's parliament, has indeed declared Jerusalem the capital. But the international consensus is that the city's final status can only be determined through a settlement with the Palestinians, who also claim the holy city as their own.
Both The Guardian and Israel are right, up to a point. The newspaper  is surely right not to call Jerusalem the capital. However, it is certainly within Israel's right to insist that Tel Aviv is not the capital either.
Confused? I am!


Confusion over the question of Israel's 'capital'

Tel Aviv is considered Israel's financial and business capital.

Opinion

Comment

News

World

Which city is Israel's capital? This is an issue that plagues many a newspaper that remains neutral in reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

My Take

My Take | Confusion over the question of Israel's 'capital'

Which city is Israel's capital? This is an issue that plagues many a newspaper that remains neutral in reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.