Name: SCMP
Telephone: +852-2680-8888

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Jake Van Der Kamp

Major cities like Hong Kong, London and New York are predicted to face unemployment rates of more than 80 per cent by 2030 when widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics accelerates automation in virtually all industries, according to an outspoken Hong Kong based venture capitalist ...
Business, February 1
I don’t know what artificial intelligence makes of this but just a modicum of normal human intelligence will quickly tell you that it is not true.
I am not referring here to the advance of robotics. That part, lamentably, is probably correct. Lamentably, I say, as I remain far from convinced that robots can make us humans any more content with our lives.
But what is not true is that automation will bring about 80 per cent unemployment rates. Think about this a little.
The reason for automating rather than going with human labour is to lower the costs of production. It may also be to meet standards of quality that unaided human hands cannot meet but this was so even when a caveman first invented the chisel. It is still gratification at acceptable cost that drives these advances.
And if the cost to you of the goods you want is lower than it was previously then you have more of your income available for spending than you did previously and you can spend it on things that you would not otherwise have bought.
Widespread automation tipped to spur 80pc unemployment rate in HK, other major cities by 2030
This in turn creates jobs in the economy. You create jobs whenever you spend money, however you spend it. Thus any loss of employment through automation is recreated as other forms of employment when you spend the money you saved as a benefit of automation.
There are times it does not quite work this way, of course, production of weaponry being an obvious example. Advances (if they can be called so) in the mega-tonnage of atom bombs are pure waste of effort if not used and, if used, create net job loss through death.
But what most people have in mind when they talk of jobs lost through automation is the experience they or friends have had of losing a good job and not being able to find another as their skills are no longer required.
There is no denying that it happens. Loss of work through dislocation of skills or job requirements is a price of automation and the burden of it falls heavily on older and lesser skilled people. Regrettable as this is, however, it does not say there are fewer jobs in total, only different ones.
And then think of the mind-numbing jobs during the mid-twentieth century in “bullpens”, office caverns with hundreds of (mostly) men squeezed in at small desks, drearily tabulating sales and survey results with pencil and paper. Gone with the wind of the digital revolution. Was that really a loss?
Or think of miners hacking out coal by pick-axe in extremely dangerous conditions underground. Would we really want to deny their successors modern mining machinery?
I don’t know precisely what new jobs will come from automation but I can be reasonably sure that they will be mostly service jobs. This has certainly been the history of the United States over the last 70 years, as the chart shows, and the Hong Kong data record generally shows the same trend.

We can also know from one obvious example of history that technological advance brings change rather than net loss of employment. Before the industrial revolution some 90 per cent of the world’s population lived directly from agriculture. That figure is now perhaps 10 per cent.
But do we now have 80 per cent unemployment around the world as a result?
No more need we fear that we will have 80 per cent unemployment in 2030 as a result of robotics.


The tale of murkiness that is the Lok Ma Chau Loop

China refusal to apologise for CCTV blackface skit all wrong

Plug Hong Kong Disney’s bottomless cash sinkhole forever and ever, and use its magic land for homes

China’s got a trade problem that can’t be solved by Belt and Road

Jake's View

The robots are coming, but they won’t be job killers

Danny Letain uses a bionic hand to open a jar at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Canada, Tuesday, May 3, 2016. When Letain lost his hand in a workplace accident 35 years ago, he never imagined he'd be able to use a bionic hand without invasive surgery. But in October, the parathlete will test a new robotic prosthesis developed by researchers at Simon Fraser University at the world's first cyborg Olympics in Zurich, the Canadian Press reports. (Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT

US employment

Engineers test a humanoid manned robot dubbed Method-2 at Hankook Mirae Technology in Seoul, South Korea. The reason for automating rather than going with human labour is to lower the costs of production. Photo: AFP

Business

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Jake's View | The robots are coming, but they won’t be job killers